20 because, given that he had been recently discharged from the Army, he assumed that they would do him no harm, 27 and he went on to Acobamba where he had some crops. 111. On July 6, 1991, Mr. Zósimo Hilario Quispe, who was on a business trip at the time, learned that his 28 relatives had disappeared and his home had been burned. The following day, Zósimo Hilario traveled from Huancavelica to the ranch at Rodeo Pampa in the company of a number of representatives of the community of Santa Barbara and, upon reaching the spot, was met by the sight of burned-out homes; food, clothing, and other 29 property strewn on the ground; and a great deal of blood in the areas around the houses. 112. On July 8, 1991, Zósimo Hilario filed a complaint with the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention alleging the detention/disappearance of his parents, Francisco Hilario Torres and Dionicia Quispe Mallqui; his sisters, Antonia Hilario Quispe and Magdalena Hilario Quispe; his sister-in-law, Mercedes Carhuapoma de la Cruz; his nieces, Yasenia Osnayo Hilario, Miriam Osnayo Hilario, and Roxana Osnayo Hilario; and his nephew Alex Jorge Hilario, who were allegedly taken by 50 soldiers and civilians in the direction of 30 the district of Lircay on July 4, 1991. 113. Likewise, on July 8, 1991, Mr. Nicolás Hilario Morán, President of Santa Barbara campesino community lodged a complaint with the Office of the Huancavelica Provincial Prosecutor for Crime Prevention alleging the disappearance on July 4, 1991, of 14 people from the community, including elderly persons and children, who were reportedly led away by army personnel and seven civilians. Mr. Hilario Morán also requested 31 the prosecutor to adopt the appropriate precautionary measures. 114. On July 9, 1991, Viviano Hilario Mancha lodged a complaint with the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention in which he Stated that on July 4, 1991, the Army had taken away his son, 32 Ramón Hilario Morán; his son's wife, Dionicia Guillén Riveros, and their two minor children. 115. On July 10, 1991, the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention, Dr. Luz Gladys Roque Montesillo, sent an official letter to the Military and Political Chief of Ayacucho to notify him of the complaint 33 presented by Zósimo Hilario Quispe and ask him if the detainees had been taken to Lircay Military Base. The 34 Army denied the detention of the above persons in an official letter dated July 11, 1991. 27 Appendix 1. Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Peru. Volume VII. Chapter 2: Cases Investigated by the CVR 2.50. The Extrajudicial Executions in Santa Barbara. Campesinos accused of being terrorists detained. 28 Appendix 1. Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Peru. Volume VII. Chapter 2: Cases Investigated by the CVR 2.50. The Extrajudicial Executions in Santa Barbara. The discovery of the bodies. 29 Appendix 1. Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Peru. Volume VII. Chapter 2: Cases Investigated by the CVR 2.50. The extrajudicial executions in Santa Barbara; The discovery of the bodies. 30 Appendix 4. Record of the complaint of Zósimo Hilario Quispe presented on July 8, 1991, to the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention. Appendix 9 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 31 Appendix 12. Complaint of Nicolás Hilario Morán, President of Santa Barbara Campesino Community, presented on July 8, 1991, to the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention. Appendix 12 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 32 Appendix 13. Record of the complaint of Viviano Hilario Mancha presented on July 9, 1991, to the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention. Appendix 11 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 33 Appendix 11. Official letter No. 0462-91-MP-FPM-HVCA of July 23, 1991, sent by the Office of Huancavelica Mixed Provincial Prosecutor to the Huancavelica Senior Superior Court Prosecutor. Appendix 24 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 34 Appendix 14. State’s brief of September 23, 1991, p. 3.