68 retains the authority inherent to its jurisdiction, to monitor compliance with this Judgment. The case will be closed once the State has fully implemented all of the provisions of this Judgment. Within one year of notification of this Judgment, the State must present a first report of the measures taken in its compliance of this Judgment. XIV OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 138. Therefore, THE COURT DECLARES, unanimously, that: 1. The State violated, in detriment of Mr. Fermín Ramírez, the right to judicial guarantees enshrined in Article 8(2)(b) and 8(2)(c) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation with Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 62, 63, 65, 66 through 68, 70 through 76, and 78 through 80 of this Judgment. 2. The State did not violate, in detriment of Mr. Fermín Ramírez the Right to Judicial Protection enshrined in Article 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, based on the reasons established in paragraphs 82 and 83 of this Judgment. 3. The State violated, in detriment of Mr. Fermín Ramírez the Freedom from Ex Post Facto Laws enshrined in Article 9 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation with Article 2 of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 81, and 90 through 98 of this Judgment. 4. The State violated, in detriment of Mr. Fermín Ramírez, the right to request a pardon or commutation of the sentence enshrined in Article 4(6) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation with Articles 1(1) and 2 of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 105 through 110 of this Judgment. 5. The State violated, in detriment of Mr. Fermín Ramírez, the right to personal integrity enshrined in Article 5(1) and 5(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation with Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 117 through 119 of this Judgment.