2 2. The note of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter "the Secretariat") of October 1, 2010, whereby, following the President of the Court's instructions (hereinafter "the Secretariat"), requested the representatives to "sub[mit] express written consent from Mrs. Rosendo Cantú regarding the publication of specific reparation measures set forth in paragraphs 213, 226, and 229 of the Judgment." 3. The brief of November 1, 2010, of the Organization of the Indigenous People of Tlapaneco/Me'phaa, the Human Rights Center of Mount "Tlachinollan" and the Center for Justice and International Law (all hereinafter "the representatives"), whereby it responded to the Tribunal's request regarding the publication of specific reparation measures set forth in the Judgment. CONSIDERING: 1. The Court stated in the Judgment (paragraphs 213, 226 and 229) that if Mrs. Rosendo Cantú were to give consent: a) "the results of the proceedings [internal criminal investigation] [would be] publicly disclosed so that the Mexican society know the true facts;" b) "[the public ceremony to acknowledge international responsibility in relation to the facts of the case would be] broadcast over a radio station with coverage in Guerrero;" and, c) "The State [must]: i) publish the official summary issued by the Court in a nationally circulated newspaper, in Spanish, and in a widely circulated newspaper in the state of Guerrero, in Spanish and Me'paa [...]; ii) publish the entire [...] Judgment [...] , together with the Me'paa translation of the official summary, on an appropriate website of the federal state and the state of Guerrero, taking into account the characteristics of the ordered publication, which must be available for at least one year; and, iii) issue the official summary, in both languages —on just one occasion— on a radio station [...] with coverage in Barranca Bejuco." 2. Regarding Mrs. Rosendo Cantú's consent for the effective implementation of the reparation measures referred to in heading a) and b) in the above paragraph, the representatives stated that the victim explicitly gave her consent for: a) "the public disclosure of the results of the criminal investigations that the State must carry out pursuant to [the Judgment];" b) "the transmission of the public ceremony to acknowledge international responsibility on a radio station with coverage in Guerrero [...] on the understanding that [...] "[t]he State must agree the means of compliance of the public recognition ceremony with [Rosendo Cantú] and/or her representatives, as well as any other details that are required." 3. The Court takes note of the express consent manifested by Mrs. Rosendo Cantú, and thus the Court believes that Mexico must proceed to effectively comply with these measures, in accordance with the Judgment. 4. Regarding the publication of the official summary of the Judgment in nationwide print media and in the state of Guerrero, the radio broadcast of the official summary on a