3 1. To grant the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights until January 12, 1998 to submit a brief and whatever evidence it might have in its possession for purposes of determining the compensation and costs in the instant case. 2. To grant Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo, the victim in the instant case, and her next of kin or their representatives, until January 12, 1998, to submit a brief and any evidence they may have for purposes of determining the compensation and costs. 3. To give the State of Peru until March 16, 1998, to present its observations on the briefs submitted by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the victim, her next of kin or their representatives, referred to in the preceding paragraphs. 6. On December 16, 1997, the Inter-American Commission informed the Court that Mr. Domingo E. Acevedo had been designated as a delegate in the instant Case, to serve with delegate Oscar Luján-Fappiano. On February 27, 1998, the Commission withdrew the appointment of attorney Verónica Gómez as its assistant. 7. On December 24, 1997, the Commission petitioned the Court seeking an extension of the deadline given to file its brief on reparations in the instant Case. By an order of that same date, the President of the Court (hereinafter "the President") extended until January 31, 1998, the deadline established for the victim, her next of kin or their representatives and the Inter-American Commission to file their briefs on reparations. The President also extended the deadline given to the State to present its brief in this matter until April 6, 1998. On January 21, 1998, the Court confirmed the President’s order. 8. On January 30, 1998, the Inter-American Commission submitted its brief on reparations in the instant Case. The victim submitted her reparations brief that same day, and indicated that the attachments thereto would be forwarded to the Court later. On February 5, 1998, the victim sent those attachments to the Court, which were then forwarded to the Commission and to the State on February 9, 1998. The only exception was a videotape, corresponding to Appendix IV; copies of that tape were made and then sent to the Commission and to Peru on February 16, 1998. 9. On February 5, 1998, the victim informed the Court that in the instant proceedings, she would be represented by Ms. Carolina Loayza-Tamayo, and by Mr. Ariel Dulitzky, Ms.Viviana Krsticevic and Ms. Marcela Matamoros, members of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), and by Mr. José Miguel Vivanco, member of Human Rights Watch/Americas. On June 18, 1998, Ms. Marcela Matamoros informed the Court that she had resigned as representative of the victim. 10. On March 9, 1998, the President summoned the victim and her next of kin or their representatives, the Inter-American Commission and Peru to a public hearing on reparations, to be held at the seat of the Court on June 9, 1998. 11. On March 24, 1998, the State requested that the Court clarify which of the briefs on reparations, presented by the victim and by the Commission was to be regarded as the “official petition” in these proceedings. On March 25, 1998, the Secretariat informed Peru that: pursuant to the article [23 of the Rules of Procedure], the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights and the victim and her representatives presented their briefs on reparations independently of each other. Hence, the State of Peru may respond to those briefs and the arguments they contain however it sees fit.