international and national legal systems are shown here in interaction, in the fight against violations to the jus cogens. 155. We are standing before a humanized ordre public (or what is the same, a truly humanistic one) where the public interest or the general interest coincides completely with the prevalence of human rights,145 - which implies the acknowledgment that human rights constitute the basic foundation, in themselves, of the legal system,146 at international and national levels. Underlying the concept of jus cogens is the natural law theory, which leads to peremptory regulations based on the affirmation and enshrinement of ethical values that seek to benefit humanity as a whole.147 156. In what refers to the right to a fair trial, the fact that Articles 25 and 8 of the American Convention are not included in the list of non-revocable rights of Article 27(2) of the same is a problem that is more apparent than real. The abolitions would only be possible if they were not compatible with the obligations imposed on the States by International Law, as warned by Article 27(1) of the Convention; here the peremptory nature of the right to a fair trial makes said lack of compatibility evident. The States Parties to the Convention have here, in my opinion, obligations based on results. 157. It would be unconceivable to deny the right to a fair trial to any person. Here, we can visualize a real right to Law, that is, the right to a legal system that effectively safeguards the rights inherent to human beings.148 This is an imperative of the jus Historical Development, Criteria, Present Status, Helsinki, Lakimiesliiton Kustannus/Finnish Lawyers' Publ. Co., 1988, pp. 605-606 and 621, and cf. pp. 602-604 and 607-608. . Cf. E. de Wet, "The Prohibition of Torture as an International Norm of Jus Cogens and Its Implications for National and Customary Law", 15 European Journal of International Law (2004) pp. 98, 100, 105, 112, and 120-121. 144 . In that sense, the emergence of a real jus commune of human rights in the international realm has been suggested; cf. M. de Salvia, "L'élaboration d'un `jus commune' des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales dans la perspective de l'unité européenne: l'oeuvre accomplie par la Commission et la Cour Européennes des Droits de l'Homme", in Protection des droits de l'homme: la dimension européenne Mélanges en l'honneur de G.J. Wiarda (eds. F. Matscher y H. Petzold), 2a. ed., Köln/Berlin, C. Heymanns Verlag, 1990, pp. 555-563; G. Cohen-Jonathan, "Le rôle des principes généraux dans l'interprétation et l'application de la Convention Européenne des Droits de l'Homme", in Mélanges en hommage à L.E. Pettiti, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 1998, pp. 168-169. 145 146 A.A. Cançado Trindade, O Esgotamento de Recursos Internos no Direito Internacional, 2ª ed., Brasília, Edit. Universidad de Brasília, 1997, pp. 265-266. . Cf. M. Ragazzi, "Alexidze on Jus Cogens (Selected Considerations)", in Theory and Practice of Contemporary International Law - Essays in Honour of Prof. L. Alexidze on the 80th Birthday Anniversary, Tbilisi, Inovatia, 2007, pp. 35 and 38. 147 . This evolution, with the acknowledgment of the direct access of individuals to international justice, currently reveals the advent of the new primacy of the reason of humanity over the reason of the State, to inspire the historical process of humanization of 148 49