4 11. On September 17, 2001 the State sent the formally signed “Agreement on comprehensive reparation to the victims and next of kin of the victims in the Barrios Altos case” (hereinafter “the agreement” or “the agreement on reparations”), attaching 4 appendices. Said agreement had been signed on August 22, 2001. 12. On October 11, 2001 the Secretariat, following instructions by the President, requested that the State, the Commission and the representatives of the victims and their next of kin submit appendices A and B of the agreement, referred to in articles six and seven of the agreement; it also requested clarification on the reason why a check was not issued to Norma Haydé Quispe Valle, mentioned as beneficiary of victim Lucio Quispe Huanaco, but rather to another daughter of the victim, Sonia Martha Quispe Valle, and that they state the name of the victim with respect to whom the following persons -to whom checks were made out- are beneficiaries of reparations: Clotilde Portella Blas, Celestina Alejandro Cristóbal, Gregoria Medina Caurino, Elías Cirilo Rosales Medina (or Caurino), and Gladys Sonia Rubina Arquiñigo. October 19, 2001 was set as the deadline to submit that information. 13. On October 17, 2001 the Fundación Ecuménica para el Desarrollo y la Paz (FEDEPAZ), on behalf of the victims and their next of kin, sent a brief to which it attached appendix B and a copy of the official letter SA-DVM.N˚ 1538-2001, which is part of appendix A of the agreement on reparations. In that brief it also stated the names of the next of kin of victim Lucio Quispe Huanaco who have been proposed as beneficiaries of the reparations, and clarified that “[t]he check with an advance on the economic reparation for Norma Haydee was issued to her sister, Sonia Martha, upon a request by the former, in view of the fact that Norma Quispe has traveled abroad”. FEDEPAZ likewise reported that it had omitted stating as next of kin of victim Alejandro Rosales Alejandro, his wife, Gregoria Medina Caurino, and his son, Elías Cirilo Rosales Caurino (or Medina). They also pointed out that “Clotilde Portella Blas as legal guardian for Rocío Rosales Capillo, received and cashed the check on her behalf”. Furthermore, they stated that they had omitted listing as beneficiaries of victim Nelly María Rubina Arquiñigo “her sister Gladis Sonia Rubina Arquiñigo and her aunt Virgilia Arquiñigo Huerta”. Finally, FEDEPAZ reported that “[t]he identity of the persons proposed as beneficiaries of each of the victims represented by [that organization] was submitted at the appropriate time to the High-level Commission established by the Government through the Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos”. 14. On October 19, 2001 the Inter-American Commission did not submit the information requested by the Secretariat (supra par. 13), but rather stated only that said information would be provided directly by the applicant. 15. That same day the Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos (CNDDHH), on behalf of the victims and their relatives, issued a communiqué to which it attached four appendices, including appendix B and a copy of official letter SADVM.N˚ 1538-2001 which is part of appendix A of the “Agreement on comprehensive reparation to the victims and next of kin of the victims in the Barrios Altos case”. In that brief they stated that “the next of kin of victim Lucio Quispe Huanaco who have been proposed include, among others, his daughters Norma Haydee Quispe Valle and their next of kin, sent a copy of the “Writ of commitment of the High-level Commission for the Barrios Altos case” and 10 appendices, including the “Agreement on comprehensive reparation to the victims and next of kin of the victims in the Barrios Altos case”.