6 supported by international jurisprudence, according to which States must fulfil their conventional international obligations in good faith (pacta sunt servanda).”4 15. That, in like manner, the State has the obligation to investigate the facts that have given rise to this request for provisional measures, in order to identify those responsible and impose upon them the pertinent punishment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, In exercise of the powers conferred upon it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Article 25 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To ratify the Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of April 7, 2000, in all of its aspects and, therefore, to request that the State adopt the necessary measures to protect the physical, psychological and moral integrity of Ms. Delia Revoredo-Marsano-de-Mur, in order to prevent her from suffering irreparable damage. 2. To request that the State and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights provide detailed information no later than September 14, 2000, on the situation of Ms. Delia Revoredo-Marsano-de-Mur and, as regards the State, that it also provide information on the measures adopted for her protection, as it should have done on April 25, 2000, in conformity with the Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of April 7, 2000. 3. To request that the State investigate the facts that gave rise to the adoption of the current provisional measures, and that it punish the persons responsible. 4. To request that, as of the date of notification of this Order, the State submit reports on the provisional measures adopted in the instant case every two months. 5. To request that the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights its observations on said reports by the State, within six weeks of receiving them. Antônio A. Cançado Trindade President Máximo Pacheco-Gómez Pesantes 4 Hernán Salgado- Cfr. inter alia, I-A Court H.R. Castillo-Petruzzi et al. Case. Compliance with judgment. Order of November 17, 1999. Series C N° 59, Considering N° 4; and Loayza-Tamayo Case. Compliance with judgment. Order of November 17, 1999, Series C N° 60, Considering N° 7; Order of the Court of June 14, 1998, Provisional Measures in the James, Briggs, Noel, García and Bethel Case, Considering N° 6; Order of the Court of August 29, 1998, Provisional Measures in the James et al. Case, Considering N° 7; and Order of the Court of May 27, 1999, Provisional Measures in the James et al. Case, Considering N° 9.