CEJIL

- Livraria
- Sign in

44 IHR Court. Case of Arrom Suhurt et al. v. Paraguay. Judgment of May 13, 2019. Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot President Eduardo Vio Grossi Humberto A. Sierra Porto Elizabeth Odio Benito L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire Ricardo Pérez Manrique Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Livraria
Login

Info
11Relationships

Search Tips

Pesquisar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND CAUSE OF ACTION3
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT4
III JURISDICTION6
IV PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS7
A. Determination and individualization of the alleged victims7
A.1 Arguments of the parties and the Commission7
A.2 Considerations of the Court7
B. On the factual framework of the case8
B.1 Arguments of the parties and the Commission8
B.2 Considerations of the Court9
V EVIDENCE10
A. Admissibility of documentary evidence10
B. Admissibility of testimonial and expert evidence12
VI FACTS13
A. Events that occurred between January 17 and 30, 200213
B. Actions taken by the next of kin and investigation of the facts17
B.1 Actions taken at the request of the next of kin17
B.2 Criminal investigation18
C. Refugee status of Juan Arrom and Anuncio Martí in Brazil21
VII MERITS22
VII-1ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS TO PERSONAL LIBERTY, PERSONAL INTEGRITY, LIFE AND RIGHT TO JURIDICAL PERSONALITY, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT RIGHTS23
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission23
B. Considerations of the Court24
B.1 Information that aims to demonstrate the alleged state participation25
B.2 The conclusions of the criminal investigation carried out on the facts32
B.3 Conclusion35
VII-2 ALLEGED VIOLATION OF JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS35
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission35
B. Considerations of the Court36
B.1 Duty to initiate an investigation ex officio37
B.2 Due diligence in the investigations38
B.3 Conclusion41
VII-3 ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY OF THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF JUAN ARROM SUHURT AND ANUNCIÓ MARTÍ MENDEZ41
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission41
B. Considerations of the Court42
VIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS42
THE COURT DECLARES:42
AND ESTABLISHES:42

Arrom Suhurt y otros. Sentença de 13 de maio de 2019

Sentença da Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Mérito

Data: 13 de mai. de 2019

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C 377

País

Paraguai

Signatarios

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Elizabeth Odio Benito
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Leoncio Patricio Pazmiño Freire
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique

Primary Documents

Arrom Suhurt y otros. Sentencia de 13 de mayo de 2019.pdf
Spanish
Download View
Arrom Suhurt y otros. Judgment. May 13, 2019.pdf
English
Download View

Supporting files

Arrom Suhurt y otros. Sentencia de 13 de mayo de 2019.docx159.35 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No Label1
- Processo1
Documentos da CorteIDH5
- Resolução da Presidência da CorteIDH2
- Resolução da Corte IDH2
- Audiência1
Mecanismo1
- Mecanismo1
País1
- País1
Signatários3
- Juíz/a e/o Comisionado/a3

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.