51 iii. (d) The State should compensate both the pecuniary and the nonpecuniary damage. In this regard, they asked the Court to order the State to: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. (e) Ensure the education and health care of the children, and widows and widowers of the alleged victims deceased during the processing of this case in the supranational jurisdiction, by granting them scholarships and incorporating them into the services of the Social Security Health Care program (ESSALUD). Recognize the years of service of the alleged victims, from the date of their dismissal, in order to calculate the compensation for their length of service, and retirement and other labor benefits they failed to perceive and which may correspond to them by law; Pay into the pension funds in which they were registered at the time of their dismissal, the contributions that should have been made to guarantee the exercise of the right to a retirement pension that corresponds to them by law; Pay the alleged victims compensation for loss of earnings, indirect damage and non-pecuniary damage in accordance with the expert opinion of Paúl Noriega Torero; Compensate the families of the former employees who are deceased; Grant one-time financial compensation to those former employees who do not wish to be reinstated in active service in Congress. This compensation should amount to the equivalent of their total loss of earnings from 1993 to 2005; Provide early retirement to the former employees subject to the Pension Regime of Decree Law No. 19990 who opt not to be reinstated into the service of Congress and who are currently at least 55 years of age in the case of men and 50 years of age in the case of women, with a minimum of 20 years of contributing to the National Pension System at the date this judgment is executed, and Recognize the years which were not worked as a result of the dismissal for the effects of applying the benefit of early retirement, and With regard to costs and expenses, they indicated that the State should reimburse the alleged victims for the expenses they incurred while seeking justice at the national level, and should reimburse the common intervenors the expenses they incurred when processing the international litigation. The State’s arguments 139. The State requested the Court to limit the reparations to those the State will provide to the employees dismissed irregularly under the guidelines established in Act No. 27803. In this regard: (a) It stated that it ratified its commitment to establish a Multisectoral Commission to review the respective dismissals and to grant benefits