-32. To request that, by January 30, 2006, the State submit to this Inter-American Court of Human Rights a report specifying such measures as may have been adopted to comply with the reparations ordered by this Court and which are still pending fulfillment, as established in Considering clauses No. 9 to 19 and the declarative paragraphs of the […] Order. 3. To call upon the representatives of the victim and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit their observations to the State’s report referred to in the preceding operative paragraph, within a period of four and six weeks, respectively, as from the date of receipt of the report, taking into consideration Considering clauses No. 14, 15 and 19 of the […] Order. 4. To continue monitoring those parts of the Judgment on preliminary objections, merits and reparations of July 2, 2004 that are still pending compliance. […] 3. The communication of October 13, 2005, whereby the victims’ representatives requested a certified copy of the Order of the Inter-American Court of September 12, 2005 (supra Having Seen clause No. 2) “for judicial purposes.” 4. The brief of October 19, 2005, whereby the State of Costa Rica (hereinafter “the State” or “Costa Rica”) submitted a copy of a communication from the agents appointed to this case to the First Civil Large Claims Court of the First Judicial Circuit of San José regarding the State’s obligation to nullify the civil damages award entered against Mauricio Herrera-Ulloa and the “La Nación” newspaper for moral damages and court costs and personal damages. In such communication, reference is made to the endorsement to Félix Przedborski-Chawa of the certificate of deposit in the sum of ¢63,811,000.00, deposited by La Nación S.A. with said civil court in the context of case No. 000476-0180-CI. Through said communication, the aforementioned court is advised that “reimbursement of the sum delivered to Przedborski-Chawa falls within the order issued by the international court,” requesting that it “tak[e] the appropriate measures to nullify the order of June 25, 2004,” and take all such steps as may be required “to secure reimbursement of the money […] to La Nación, S.A.” 5. The brief of November 29, 2005 and the Appendix thereto, whereby the State requested a certified copy of the Order issued by the Court on September 12, 2005 (supra Having Seen clause No. 2). Furthermore, the State submitted a copy of the order handed down on October 21, 2005 by the First Civil Large Claims Court of the First Judicial Circuit of San José regarding the “enforcement of judgment proceeding instituted by Félix Przedborski-Chawa against Mauricio Herrera-Ulloa and La Nación Sociedad Anónima.” Through said order, the aforementioned court requested submission of a certified copy of the abovementioned Order of the Inter-American Court on compliance with the judgment in order to “assess the legal grounds for the petition submitted to [said] authority,” and noted that, unless evidence is provided proving that the Court ordered the State to “unofficially order the money deposited returned,” La Nación S. A. should “request […] reimbursement” of the amount claimed. 6. The brief of November 29, 2005, whereby the victim’s representative requested a certified copy of the Judgment rendered by the Court in the instant case on July 2, 2004 (supra Having Seen clause No. 1). 7. The brief of January 30, 2006 and the Appendixes thereto, whereby the State submitted its report on compliance with the Judgment pursuant to the provisions of