4 11. That the Tribunal believes that the written information provided up to this point does not allow effective evaluation of the State’s compliance with the outstanding operative paragraphs of the Judgment in this case. 12. That with seven years passed since the Court issued the Judgment and more than 16 years since the occurrence of the relevant events in this case, it is essential that the Tribunal be informed, in greater detail, of the measures the State has adopted in complying with the Judgment, to the end that it may assess their implementation. Therefore, it is the State’s responsibility to demonstrate to the Inter-American Court that it has undertaken, with all due diligence, its obligations established in operative paragraphs six, seven, and eight of the Judgment. 13. That given the aforementioned, this Presidency considers it imperative that, in the opportunity mentioned in operative paragraph one of this Order, the State present detailed and current information on: a) the payment to the 270 victims of the amounts corresponding to loss of salaries and other employment rights for which they qualify according to legislation, payment that, in the case of workers who have passed away, should be made to their heirs (operative paragraph six of the Judgment, February 2, 2001). In that regard, the Tribunal requires information, including the necessary source documentation, on: i) specific action taken by the State and the advances toward compliance with this obligation; ii) the details of the payments made in the way of lost salaries and other labor rights to each one of the victims; the amount still outstanding for each of the victims; and if any of the victims has been fully compensated; iii) the proposal of a payment of 20 million balboas mentioned by the State in communication dated November 29, 2006, and January 22, 2007, the parts of the Judgment this proposal refers to, the method of its distribution, the method of payment, and the details of the amount of compensation that each of the victims would receive; iv) the return to the victims or their heirs of the amount that the State has deducted from their compensation for income tax, in accordance with paragraph 30.a) of the Order on monitoring compliance, issued by the Tribunal on November 28, 2005; and v) the names of the victims who have passed away and the state of payments to their heirs, specifically those who have received payment and those who are still owed. b) the reinstatement of the 270 victims in their positions or, if that is not possible, the provision of alternative employment that equals the conditions, salaries, and compensation that they had at the time they were fired. In the event that this is not possible either, the State must proceed with the payment of compensation that corresponds to the termination of