ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FEBRUARY 3, 2010 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REGARDING COLOMBIA CASE OF CABALLERO DELGADO AND SANTANA HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgments on the merits, reparations, and costs issued in the case of Caballero Delgado and Santana by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court,” “the Court,” or “the Tribunal”) on December 8, 1995, and January 29, 1997, respectively. 2. The Orders of the Inter-American Court of December 7, 1994; January 31, April 16, and September 19, 1997; June 3, 1999; July 4, 2006, and February 6, 2008, all issued in relation with the present provisional measures. In its most recent Order, the Court decided, inter alia: 1. To require the State to maintain and adopt the necessary measures to protect the life and personal integrity of […] María Nodelia Parra and Gonzalo Arias Alturo. 2. To reiterate to the State to investigate the facts that originated and motivated the maintenance of the provisional measures, and if it is the case, to identify those responsible and impose the corresponding sanctions. 3. To reiterate to the State that it must give participation to the beneficiaries in the planning and implementation of the measures of protection and that, in general, to keep the Court informed about the advance of the measures dictated by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 3. The briefs of August 1 and September 19, 2008, and May 28, July 7 and 16, 2009 and their attachments, by which the Republic of Colombia (hereinafter “the State” or “Colombia”) presented information about: a) the actions to implement the present provisional measures and the mechanisms of protection adopted in favor of the beneficiaries; b) the results of the re-evaluation study of the risk level and degree of threat facing Ms. María Nodelia Parra, and c) the concrete measures of internal protection that could be adopted regarding both beneficiaries. 4. The briefs of March 2, June 27, August 25, September 24, and October 1, 2009 and their attachments, by which the representatives of the beneficiaries (hereinafter “the representatives”) presented their observations to the reports of the State and additional information regarding the case, and discussed: a) the request for additional information formulated by the Court on June 17, 2009, regarding the situation of extreme gravity and urgency of the beneficiaries; b) the alleged lack of investigation of the facts that motivated the present measures, and c) the alleged

Select target paragraph3