obligations by allusion." It also suggested reformulating certain aspects of articles 25, 26 and 41. 12. In its turn, the delegation of Mexico 24 stated that: Serious doubts arise as to the advisability of including in the preliminary draft the rights enshrined in Article 25 of the Draft: On the one hand, such a statement could be repetitive, since it is already included in Article 31 of the Protocol of Amendment to the Charter of the OAS. Next, unlike all the other rights mentioned in the draft –which are rights enjoyed by the individual as a person or as a member of a given social group– it is difficult at a given moment to establish precisely which person or persons would be directly affected in the event that the rights contained in the aforementioned article 25 were violated. The same could be said with regard to the degree of difficulty involved in determining which authority, if any, would be responsible for such a violation. 13. In the same vein, the delegation of Brazil 25 proposed to make certain amendments to the above-mentioned articles and, to this end, expressed the need to bear in mind that: Civil and political rights entail an effective judicial protection both domestically and internationally against violations practiced by the organs of the State or their representatives. On the other hand, economic, social, and cultural rights are contemplated in very different degrees and forms by the legislation of the different American States and, although governments wish to recognize them all, their validity depends substantially on the availability of material resources that allow for their implementation. Article 25 of the draft was inspired by this concept, but its text does not correspond to its intention. 14. Along with these observations, there were others along the same lines, i.e., pointing to the need to amend certain aspects of the proposal, made by Argentina 26 and Guatemala. 27 15. In the context of the debate held at the Inter-American Specialized Conference on Human Rights, the aforementioned articles 25 and 26 of the Draft were discussed in greater detail, and the following proposal of precepts referring to economic, social, and cultural rights was approved 28 and presented to the plenary session: 29 Chapter III. Economic, social, and cultural rights Article 26. Progressive development The States Parties undertake to adopt measures, both in the domestic sphere and through international cooperation, especially those of an economic and technical nature, with a view to achieving progressively, by legislation or other appropriate means, the full realization of the rights implicit in the economic, social, educational, scientific, and cultural standards set forth in the Charter of the Organization of American States as amended by the Protocol of Buenos Aires, to the extent of available resources, through legislation or other appropriate means. Article 27. Control of compliance with obligations The States Parties shall transmit to the Commission a copy of each of the reports and studies that they submit annually to the Executive Committees of the Inter‑American Economic and Social Council and the Inter‑American Council for Education, Science, and Culture, in their respective fields, so that the Commission may verify whether the aforementioned obligations, Cf. Inter-American Specialized OEA/Ser.K/XVI/1.2, p. 101. 25 Cf. Cf. 124-125. 26 Cf. Inter-American Specialized OEA/Ser.K/XVI/1.2, p. 47. 27 Cf. Inter-American Specialized OEA/Ser.K/XVI/1.2, p. 107. 28 Cf. Cf. 276. 29 Cf. Inter-American Specialized OEA/Ser.K/XVI/1.2, p. 318 and 384. 24 Conference on Human Rights, Proceedings and Documents, Conference on Human Rights, Proceedings and Documents, Conference on Human Rights, Proceedings and Documents, Conference on Human Rights, Proceedings and Documents, 7