45. Regarding the circumstances of disappearance, the record contains the statements by Candelaria Vergara issued in two opportunities79, which are consistent with her version before the PGN which highlights the responsibility of the State and the connection with his activities. There is also the statement of a professor of the Kennedy school, which was ratified in her version of having heard shots on the day of the disappearance of Pedro Julio Movilla Galarcio.80 The General Prosecutor’s Office also took a statement from a professor, which indicated that he gathered versions from students’ and parents’ of the Kennedy school of whom he learnt that “some men driving motorcycles” took a man.81 46. As regards the intelligence actions against the alleged victim, a copy of the judicial process and detention of Mr. Callejas were added, as well as the interrogatories related to his activism to the PCC-ML and his alleged connections with the EPL. He was taken testimony once again, in which he provided, one more time, details of the circumstances of his detention.82 The General Prosecutor’s Office also carried out proceedings for the determination of the militaries who participated in the Mr. Callejas’ arrest, without getting any clarifications on this point.83 47. The General Prosecutor’s Office took the statements of the Director of Intelligence of the Army84 and of an Intelligence Analyst85 on duty at the time of the events, who reported that they did not know the source of the intelligence records about Pedro Julio Movilla Galarcio, as the sources of intelligence information were varied and did not respond to an order or operation, but that they were part of the consubstantial labors of this kind of service. Moreover, by means of the Human Rights Group of Investigations and Humanitarian International Law86, it requested the Dijin87, the Military Intelligence Direction88, and the Section of Criminal Analysis of the General Prosecutor’s Office89 to inform about the existence of records related to subversive organizations between 1992 and 1994, or any subject identified with the alias “Milton.” The Commission notes that the Military Intelligence Direction 90 , as opposed to what was indicated in 1993, informed that it did not find the aforesaid records; and neither did the Section of Criminal Analysis.91 The IACHR does not observe a response of the part of the Dijin to the request of the General Prosecutor’s Office. Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Declaration of Candelaria Vergara of April 13, 1994 and June 7, 2012. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 80 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Statement by Martha Yolanda Medina de Chaparro, professor of the Kennedy school. April 12, 1996. Annex to petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 81 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Testimony by Carlos Eduardo Otárola García. April 12, 1996. Annex to petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 82 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Declaration of Mr. Humberto Javier Callejas Rua. October 25, 2012. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 83 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad.No.096. Report No. 000003 SIA of February 5, 1999. Annex to petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012; Annex x. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No.096. Official Communication of the National Armed Forces. Official Communication No. 003/SAYP-N2-SUB-252 of the Department of Intelligence N2-FNA of January 4, 1999. Annex to petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012; Annex x. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No.096. Statement by the non-commissioned officer of the National Police, Fanor Rodríguez España of February 7, 2001. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 84 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Statement by Lieutenant Coronel Gilberto Castellanos of September 3, 1999. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 85 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Declaration of the Major General Iván Ramírez Quinteros of October 1, 1999. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 86 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Official communication to the Group of Investigations U.D.H. June 25, 2012. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 87 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Official communication to the Intelligence Direction of the National Police. June 8, 2012. Annex to petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 88 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Official communication to the Military Intelligence Direction. June 8, 2012. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 89 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. General communication to the Section of Criminal Analysis of the General Prosecutor’s Office. June 8, 2012. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 90 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Report of the Military Intelligence Direction. August 4, 2012. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 91 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Report of the Section of Criminal Analysis. Illegal armed persons. June 25, 2012. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 79 12