hoods.34 They also reveal that in the same place, around 9:00 a.m., a subject dressed in a coffee-colored suit, presumably intoxicated, shot at the air, which made the professors call the Command of Comprehensive Attention (Comando de Atención Integral) (hereinafter “the CAI”), who seized the gun and arrested the individual.35 30. The events related to the shootings were reported by the PGN in the following way: “pursuant to the special visit carried out at Station 100 of the CDA [Command of National Police (Comando de Policía Nacional) (hereinafter “the CDA”) to the daily summary of news, Mr. Pedro Julián Pabón Díaz was arrested at Primero de Mayo Avenue with Carrera 50. He was seized a Llama 38-caliber revolver, for having fired three shots into the air in an intoxication state, being driven to the XIV police station of the neighborhood of Ricaurte in this city.”36 Likewise, in the context of the investigations of the PGN37 of the FGN38, the IACHR identifies that it was determined that the gun belonged to lieutenant Ramiro Bohórquez Neuta (active police member at the time of the events).39 31. The State indicated that “in the disciplinary process it was established that Mr. Ramiro Bohórquez Neuta does not know Mr. Pedro Julio Movilla, according to the statement given by the Police Officer, and nor does he know Mr. Pedro Julián Pabón.” Likewise, regarding the seized arm, the State indicated that “Mr. Bohórquez reported that approximately a year ago, his gun was lost and that was never able to recover it, therefore, he filed the respective complaint before the disciplinary authority.” The State concluded indicating that “any irregularity alleged by the petitioners regarding the complaint filed for the missing gun (...) does not conform to the records of the criminal and disciplinary investigation.”40 E. Investigation and proceedings regarding the disappearance of Julio Movilla Galarcio 32. The case files show that three internal proceedings were carried out: disciplinary, criminal and contentious-administrative. Moreover, on May 18, 1993, the CCAJAR lodged an habeas corpus action before the Criminal Court No. 54 of the Bogotá Circuit, which was declared inadmissible on May 19 because the place of capture of the missing person was not indicated in the complaint.41 Likewise, on September 7, 1993, the Regional Prosecutor’s Office of Medellin, Antioquia, issued a ruling of preliminary investigation42 due to the complaint filed by the Union Federation of Workers of Antioquia (Federación Sindical de Trabajadores de Antioquia) –FESUTRAN-CUT for the same events43, which was brought forward for the abduction felony. In this last process, on October 19, 1993, it was ordered to remit the proceedings to another unit due to jurisdiction matters.44 The IACHR does not have further information regarding these procedures. 1. Disciplinary process before the PGN Some testimonies indicate that their face was covered by hoods and others by helmets. Annex X. PGN, Record No. 008-139893. Evaluation report on investigation proceedings – Conclusions. June 4, 1993. Annex to petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 36 Annex X. PGN, Record No. 008-139893. Evaluation report on investigation proceedings. June 4, 1993. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. Such information refers to the report of the Metropolitan Police of Santa Fe de Bogotá, Station Onehundred, of the Incident of “Illegal possession of weapons” at Primero de Mayo avenue & CR 50 on May 13, 1993: “A llama CASIDI revolver is seized; 38 long, blued, with three cartridges and three cases, No. IM-9753g, carried by Mr. Pedro Luis Pabón Díaz, (...)” 37 Annex X. PGN, Record No. 008-139893. Report of the special visit at the legal office of the Department for the Control of Arms, Ammunitions and Explosives Trade of Colombia. November 4, 1993. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 38 Annex X. General Prosecutor’s Office, Rad. No. 096. Report of the Department for the Control of Arms, Ammunitions and Explosives Trade of Colombia. March 2, 2009. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 39 Annex X. PGN, Record No. 008-139893. Report of the Special Procedures Division officers section. November 8, 1993. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 40 Annex X. State’s communication of November 16, 2017. 41 Annex X. Ruling of the Criminal Circuit 54 on the Habeas Corpus action in favor of Julio Movilla Galarcio. May 19, 1993. The action is rejected by virtue of Art. 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that states that “the request should state the place in which the person is arrested and, possibly, the name of the officer who ordered the arrest.” Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 42 Annex X. Ruling of preliminary investigation of the Prosecutor’s Office of Medellin. September 7, 1993. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 43 Annex X. Letter from FESUTRAN addressed to PGN. June 10, 1993. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 44 Annex X. Ruling of preliminary investigation of the Prosecutor’s Office of Medellin. October 19, 1993. Annex to the petitioners’ communication of January 28, 2012. 34 35 8