9 34. In relation to the request for comprehensive, detailed and specific information, requested by the Court in an Order of 9 July 2009, in order to verify compliance with the obligation to pay the compensation set forth in Annexes I, II and III of the Judgment of July 1, 2006, as pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, the State indicated that "the acknowledgment of people who were not linked to the [J]udgment came as a result of the Interdisciplinary Group for Human Rights proving, before [the] Ministry, the relationship between the beneficiaries and the victims, pursuant to paragraph 358 of the [J]udgment." In this regard, the State submitted a list which links the names of the beneficiaries and their relationship with the victims provided for in Resolutions issued by the Ministry of National Defense 7 and they were not included in the annexes of the Judgment. Representatives, meanwhile, indicated that they declared that the State had paid the values reported to the Court, "pursuant to Resolutions 5898, 2088 and 1946, 2008, regarding Annexes I and II, regarding Annex III, it has paid the appropriate amounts for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, and the Housing Program agreement was pending," although they did not submit the relevant documentation claiming they had no human or material resources to do so. They also stated, in general, "that all information submitted by the State regarding the compensation is correct; however, in order to declare compliance with the measure with regard to Annex III, it must be bore in mind that the housing program is included and it has not yet been fulfilled. " 35. Regarding the alleged lacking of a payment to the next-of-kin of the victim Omar Ivan Gutiérrez Nohava, the State indicated that, when settling the Judgment, seven of the victims' relatives were disregarded since the State, through Resolution 1459 of 12 September 2005, ordered the payment of damages provided for in the settlement, which were greater than the values stipulated in the Judgment of the Court The State indicated that the same situation arose with two relatives of Mr. Othniel de Jesús Tejada, since through Resolution 1458 of December 12, 2005 the payment of damages was ordered, as provided for in the settlement, that exceed the compensation set by the Court. 36. Regarding the claims filed directly before the Court by Marta Marleny Barrera Pino, and which were provided for in considering paragraph 63 of the Order of the Court of July 9, 2009, the State reported that "to date no claim has [been made]." For their part, the representatives reported that they have never represented Marta Marleny Barrera Pino and 7 Beneficiaries of the victim William de Jesús Villa Garcia: Dora Elena Villa García, sister, Juan Guillermo Villa García, brother, Lorena María Villa García, sister, Adiela Patricia Villa García, sister, Luz Mariela Villa García, sister, Luis Alfredo Villa García, brother, Marta Lucía Villa García, sister, Olga Cecilia Villa García, sister, William Alejandro Villa Henao, brother (Resolutions 5898 of December 28, 2007 and 1946 of May 19, 2008). Regarding the beneficiaries of María Graciela Arboleda Rodríguez, the State indicated that through Resolution 5898 of December 28, 2007, Resolution 1946 of May 19, 2008, and Resolution 5302 of December 5, 2008, compensation was awarded to: Claudia García Arboleda, daughter, Maribel Garcia Arboleda, daughter, Luis Fernando García Arboleda, son, Yeison Arley García Arboleda, son, María Eloisa Arboleda Rodríguez, sister, Berta Inés Arboleda Rodríguez, sister, María Guillermina Rodríguez, sister, Diana Janett García Arboleda, daughter, and Andrés Ubeimar García Arboleda, son. Similarly, in relation to Mr. Jairo de Jesús Sepúlveda Arias, the State indicated that through Resolution 5898 of December 28, 2007, the State awarded compensation to: Sofía Elvia Sepúlveda Arias, sister, Ligia Amparo Sepúlveda Arias, sister, Ramón Eduardo Sepúlveda Arias, brother, Javier de Jesús Sepúlveda Arias, brother, Luz Mariela Sepúlveda de Meneses, sister, and Olga Lucia Sepúlveda Arias, sister. Regarding the beneficiaries of Mr. Othniel de Jesús Tejada Jaramillo: María Dolores Jaramillo Oquendo, mother, and Danilo de Jesús Tejada, brother, the State indicated that they were not entitled. Regarding the beneficiaries of Mr. Omar Ivan Gutiérrez Nohava: compensation was awarded in Resolution 4713 of 29 October 2008 to the following: Orlando de Jesús Gutiérrez Nohava, brother, Luz Amparo Gutiérrez Pérez, sister, and William de Jesús Gutiérrez Nohava, brother. Regarding the beneficiaries of the victim Dora Luz Areiza Arroyave, through Resolution 5898 of December 28, 2007 compensation was awarded to Uber Arlei Aleiza Arroyave, brother. Regarding the beneficiaries of the victim Omar de Jesús Ortiz Carmona, through Resolution 5898 of December 28, 2007 compensation was awarded to: Oscar Obed Ortiz Carmona, brother, and María del Carmen Ortiz Carmona, sister.