1 INTER - AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS COMISION INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS COMISSÃO INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS COMMISSION INTERAMÉRICAINE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ORGANIZACIÓN DE LOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS WASHINGTON, D.C. 2 0 0 0 6 EEUU May 29, 2012 Ref.: Case No. 12.167 Hugo Oscar Arguelles y otros Argentina Mr. Secretary: I am pleased to address you on behalf of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in order to file Case No. 12.167 Hugo Oscar Arguelles et al. v. Argentina (hereinafter “the State”, “the Argentinian State” or “Argentina”) before the jurisdiction of the Honorable Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding the with the violation of the right to personal liberty and the right to a fair trial in the domestic proceedings against members of the military for the crime of military fraud, pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Military Justice of Argentina (hereinafter CMJ), then in force. Specifically, the facts that gave rise to this case occurred during 1978-1980; and they resulted in the detention in solitary confinement [incomunicado] of approximately 50 officers, 21 of which are victims in the instant case, who were in charge of funds belonging to a number of Argentine Air Force bases. In its Merits Report, the Commission concluded that the State infringed upon the right, with prejudice to the victims, to have technical assistance in their defense, as article 87 of the CMJ did not grant defendants the right to a lawyer but only to be defended by an active or retired military officer, and the right to defense by a lawyer was provided for once the defendant had made a statement before the court (article 252, CMJ). It was also the opinion of the Commission that the victims remained incommunicado for a period exceeding the permissible limit under the CMJ; that the CMJ did not establish a deadline for the Military Tribunal to decide the case of a detainee, and that, moreover, the victims were in preventive detention for nearly 7 years, with no justification given by the State for the delay. Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary Inter-American Court of Human Rights Apartado 6906-1000, San José, Costa Rica Regarding the CMJ, the Commission held that it included certain provisions that prima facie constituted an infringement of the right to a fair trial and to access to justice, which was acknowledged by the State itself when it repealed the code; the repeal, however, did not result in reparations for the victims. It should be noted that the State repealed the CMJ in the framework of

Select target paragraph3