61 complied with all its terms. Within six months of notification of this judgment, the State shall provide the Court with a report on the measures adopted to comply with it. XII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 289. Therefore, THE COURT DECIDES, unanimously: 1. To reject the preliminary objections filed by the State in the terms of paragraphs 13 to 23 of this judgment. DECLARES, unanimously, that: 2. It accepts the partial acknowledgement of international responsibility made by the State, in the terms of paragraphs 25 to 34 of this judgment. 3. The State violated the rights to personal liberty, judicial guarantees, personal integrity, and property embodied in Articles 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(4), 7(5), 7(6), 8(1), 8(2), 8(2)(c), 8(2)(d), 5(1), 5(2) and 21(2) of the American Convention in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, to the detriment of Juan Carlos Chaparro Álvarez, in the terms of paragraphs 73, 86, 88, 105, 119, 136, 147, 154, 158, 161, 165, 172, 195, 199, 204, 209 and 214 of this judgment. 4. The State violated the rights to personal liberty, judicial guarantees, personal integrity, and property embodied in Articles 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(5), 7(6), 8(1), 8(2), 8(2)(c), 8(2)(e), 5(1), 5(2), 21(1) and 21(2) of the American Convention in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, to the detriment of Freddy Hernán Lapo Íñiguez, in the terms of paragraphs 66, 87, 88, 105, 119, 130, 136, 147, 154, 159, 161, 172 and 218 of this judgment. 5. It is not necessary to rule on the alleged violation of the right embodied in Article 7(4) of the American Convention to the detriment of Freddy Hernán Lapo Íñiguez, for the reasons set out in paragraph 77 of this judgment. 6. There has been no violation of the right embodied in Article 25 of the American Convention to the detriment of Juan Carlos Chaparro Álvarez and Freddy Hernán Lapo Íñiguez, for the reasons set out in paragraph 139 of this judgment. AND RULES, unanimously, that: 7. This judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation.