61. Finally, neither the failure to establish the foundation or the inadmissibility of the petitioners’ arguments is evident, accordingly the Commission concludes that the petition satisfies the requirements set out at Articles 47(b) and (c) of the American Convention. V. CONCLUSIONS 62. Based on the considerations of fact and law set forth above, and without prejudging on the merits, the Inter-American Commission concludes that this claim meets the admissibility requirements set forth in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention, and accordingly, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 1. To declare the petition admissible in relation to Articles 5, 7, 8, 11, 24, and 25 of the American Convention in conjunction with the obligations established in Articles 1(1) and 2 of the same instrument; and in relation to Articles 1, 6, and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture. 2. To notify the State and the petitioners of this decision. 3. To initiate the processing of the case on the merits. 4. To publish this decision and include it in the Annual Report, to be presented to the General Assembly of the OAS. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 6th day of the month of November 2014. (Signed): Tracy Robinson, President; Rose-Marie Belle Antoine, First Vice President; Felipe González, Second Vice President; José de Jesús Orozco, Paulo Vannuchi and James Cavallaro, Commissioners. 11