INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF CUYA LAVY ET AL. V. PERU JUDGMENT OF JULY 27, 2022 (Interpretation of the judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs) In the case of Cuya Lavy et al. v. Peru, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court” or “this Court”), composed of the following judges: L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire, Acting President Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, Ricardo Pérez Manrique, also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Registrar Romina I. Sijniensky, Deputy Registrar, pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter also “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Article 68 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), renders its decision on the request for interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the instant case delivered by the Court on September 28, 2021 (hereinafter also “the judgment”), that was filed on March 8, 2022, by the State of Peru (hereinafter “the Peruvian State”, “the State” or“Peru”).  This interpretation of judgment was delivered during the sixty-fifth special session of the Court, which was held virtually using technological resources pursuant to the Court’s Rules of Procedure. Judges Elizabeth Odio Benito and Eduardo Vio Grossi did not take part in the deliberation and signature of this judgment due to circumstances beyond their control that were accepted by the full Court.