16.
The State must provide the medical and psychological treatment required by the
155 victims, in the terms of paragraphs 268 to 270 of th[e] judgment.
17.
The State must create a website for the search for children abducted and illegally
held, in the terms of paragraphs 271 to 274 of th[e] judgment.
18.
The State must pay the amounts awarded in paragraphs 292 to 295 and 303 and
304 of th[e] judgment as compensation for non-pecuniary damage and reimbursement of
costs and expenses, in the terms of paragraphs 278 to 295, 300 to 304 and 305 of th[e]
judgment.
2.
The reports of the Republic of Guatemala (hereinafter “Guatemala” or “the
State”) on the progress made in complying with the judgment, presented on March
25, June 2, December 17 and December 21, 2010, and March 18 and July 4, 2011.
3.
The observations of the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the
representatives”) on the State’s reports on compliance, presented on April 20 and July
1, 2010, and January 19, February 9, February 15 and June 28, 2011.
4.
The observations of the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights
(hereinafter “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) on the State’s
reports on compliance, presented on May 14 and July 14, 2010, and February 17 and
May 17, 2011.
5.
The communication of the Secretariat of July 27, 2011, in which it reiterated to
the State the request to forward the proof of payment to Rodrigo Mayén Ramírez,
Receipt No. 95, which had been requested in a note of this Secretariat of May 30,
2011, Ref. CDH-11,681/230.
6.
The communication of the Secretariat of June 30, 2011, in which it asked the
representatives to submit, by July 4, 2011 at the latest, the names, together with any
additional documentation, of those persons who had received payment of the
corresponding compensation. It also asked the State, if applicable, to forward the
names and corresponding proof of payment of those persons who had received
payment of the compensation after May 9, 2011. On July 4, 2011, the State and the
representatives answered the said communication. The communication of the
Secretariat of July 5, 2011, in which it forwarded the above-mentioned information to
the Inter-American Commission, and asked that it submit observations in this regard.
CONSIDERING THAT:
1.
One of the inherent attributes of the jurisdictional functions of the Court is to
monitor compliance with its decisions.
2.
Guatemala has been a State Party to the American Convention on Human
Rights (hereinafter “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) since May 25,
1978, and accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court on March 9, 1987.
3.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 67 of the American Convention, the
State must fully comply with the Court's judgments. Furthermore, Article 68(1) of the
American Convention stipulates that “the State Parties to the Convention undertake
to comply with the Court's decisions in any case to which they are parties.” To this
2