55. The Commission concludes that it is competent to examine the claims presented by the petitioners regarding the alleged violation of Articles 8, 13 and 25, in relation to Articles 1.1 and 2 of the American Convention, and that those claims are admissible pursuant to the requirements set forth in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. 56. Based on the foregoing legal and factual considerations, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 1. To find this petition admissible with respect to Articles 8, 13 and 25, in connection with Articles 1.1 and 2 of the American Convention. 2. Convention. To find this petition inadmissible with respect to Articles 7 and 21 of the American 3. To provide notice of this decision to the State and to the petitioners. 4. To continue with the analysis of the merits of the case. 5. To publish this decision and to include it in its Annual Report to the OAS General Assembly. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 27th day of the month of October, 2015. (Signed): Rose-Marie Belle Antoine, President; James L. Cavallaro, First Vice President; Felipe González, and Tracy Robinson; and Rosa María Ortiz and Paulo Vannuchi (dissenting opinion), Commissioners. 11