establish a cultural center and museum. The representatives also indicated that the development association was an imposed form of municipal organization. 331. The State rejected, in general, the claims submitted by the Commission and the representatives. 332. Given that the State was found responsible for the violation of Articles 21 and 25 of the Convention, as well as the fact that the purpose of all the different measures of reparation requested by the representatives is to develop and improve the productivity of the community’s territory (supra para. 316), as it has in previous cases, 345 the Court finds it appropriate to analyze the said measures in light of the creation of a community development fund as compensation for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered by the members of the community. This fund is additional to any other present or future benefit that may correspond to the Punta Piedra community as a result of the general duty of the State to promote development. 333. In view of the measures of reparation requested by the Commission and the representatives, the dispossession of its territory, the damage caused to the territory and the fact that “[i]ndigenous peoples have a right to the conservation and protection of the environment and the productive capacity of their lands or territories and resources,” 346 the Court orders that the fund have the following objectives: (i) to develop projects aimed at increasing agricultural or any other kind of productivity in the community; (ii) to improve the community’s infrastructure based on its present and future needs; (iii) to restore the deforested areas, and (iv) others that are considered pertinent to benefit the Punta Piedra community. 334. The State must adopt all the necessary administrative, legislative, financial and human resource measures to implement this fund. Therefore, within three months of notification of this judgment, it must appoint an authority with the required competence to administer the fund. For its part, the Punta Piedra community must elect its representatives for the discussions with the State to ensure that the fund is implemented in keeping with the community’s wishes. 335. The State must allocate the sum of US$1,500,000 (one million five hundred thousand United States dollars) to this fund, to be invested for the benefit of the territory titled to the Punta Piedra community within at most three years of notification of this judgment. 336. Lastly, the Court establishes that the parties must forward the Court an annual report during the execution period describing the projects in which the sum allocated to the Fund will be invested. D. Satisfaction: publication and broadcasting of the judgment 337. Neither the representatives nor the Commission or the State referred to this measure of reparation. and almond, and (ii) the creation of a shelter with all necessary infrastructure for cases of natural disasters in the high area of the village, the location to be determined by the people of the community. 345 Cf. Case of the Yakye Axa Indigenous Community, supra, para. 205; and Case of the Xákmok Kásek Indigenous Community, supra, para. 323. 346 Cf. Article 29(1) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of September 13, 2007. 93