36 110. Before analyzing the measures of reparations so required, the Court notes that the State did not present specific arguments on the measures of reparations requested by the Commission or the representative, but that it only considered that such requests were “inadmissible and unfounded” and required the Court to reject them. Nevertheless, it requested that, in the event the Court declares the responsibility of State, “to determine what form compensation should take with reference to Perú’s national jurisdiction”. A) Injured Party 111. The Commission and the representative agree on determining that the “injured parties” are the “273 members of the Association”. In this regard, the Commission further asserted that "[i]t should be borne in mind that many of the victims in this case are deceased, so that the amount owed to them should be paid to their heirs”. 112. This Tribunal recalls that an injured party is considered to be the victim of a violation of some of the rights enshrined in the Convention.95 Moreover, as the Court has held in previous cases, the alleged victims must be mentioned in the application and in the Commission's report according to Article 50 of the Convention.96 113. Therefore, this Tribunal considers as “injured party”, pursuant to Article 63(1) of the American Convention, the 273 members of the Association, mentioned in the application of the Commission, as well as in the following table, who in their capacity as victims of the violations declared herein (supra paras. 79 to 91) shall be the beneficiaries of the reparations ordered by the Tribunal: 1. Acevedo Buendía, Alejandro 138. López Solórzano, widower of Sunico, Rosa Judith 2. Acevedo Castro, Apolonio 139. López Rubiños, Jorge Percy 3. Acevedo León de Dávila, Isabel Zoila 140. Lora Cortinez, Juan 4. Acosta Arandia, Asunción Graciela 141. Lucero Álvarez, Manuel Gerónimo 5. Acosta Trujillo, Marcial 142. Lucero Palomares, Abraham 6. Agüero Ayala, Zósimo 143. Luna Heredia De Rodríguez, María Maruja Elvira 7. Aguilar Arévalo, Augusto Marcos 144. Macchiavello Yolanda 8. Aguilar Serrano, Miguel Tulio 145. Manyari Palacios, Guido Alberto 9. Aguirre Calderón, Emilio Fernando 146. Marin Gil, Juan 10. Alarcón Coronado De Pérez, Nilda René 147. Martínez Marin, Alicia León Vda. de León, 95 Cf. Case of the "White Van" (Paniagua Morales et al.) V. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of May 25, 2001. Series C No. 76, para. 82; Case of Kawas Fernández, supra note 13, para. 160; Case of Tristán Donoso V. Panamá. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of January 27, 2009. Series C No. 193, para. 180. 96 Cf. Case of the Ituango Massacres V. Colombia. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 1, 2006. Series C No. 148, para. 98; Case of Kawas Fernández, supra note 13, para. 27; and Case of Perozo et al., supra note 13, para. 50. Teresa