277. The Argentine State indicated that in a public act held on March 24, 2004, then-President Néstor Kirchner “asked for forgiveness on behalf of the National State […] for so many atrocities,” and therefore, in principle, no similar measures are needed. In this sense, Argentina pointed to the public event that took place on the occasion of the creation of the Museum of Memory and for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights, held in the former headquarters of the Navy Mechanics School (ESMA), which functioned as a clandestine detention and torture center in Buenos Aires.298 Although this act was related to the serious facts that took place during the dictatorship, the Court notes that it was not carried out in agreement with the victims of this case for the purposes of defining the different aspects of the event. Additionally, there is no information on whether they were able to participate in any way. 278. The Court therefore orders Argentina to hold a public act of acknowledgment of international responsibility for the facts of this case. This act must include reference to the human rights violations declared in this Judgment. The act must be carried out through a public ceremony led by senior State authorities and with the attendance of Anatole Alejandro and Claudia Victoria Larrabeiti Yáñez or their representatives. It must be covered extensively and disseminated nationally.299 For this purpose, the State and the victims or their representatives must agree on the method of carrying out the public act, as well as pertinent details, including where and when it is to be held. 300 The State has one year, counted from the notification of this Judgment, to comply with the measure ordered. D.2. Publication of the Judgment 279. As it has in other cases,301 this Court orders the State to publish, within six months of notification of this Judgment and in an appropriate and legible font: (a) one time only, the official summary of this Judgment prepared by the Court in the Official Gazette; and (b) this Judgment in its entirety, to be available for one year, on an official website. The State must advise this Court immediately when it has issued each of the publications ordered, regardless of the one-year time frame for presentation of its first report, as established in the operative paragraph 19 of this Judgment. D.3. Audiovisual documentary dissemination of the truth for the preservation of memory and 280. In response to the request by the Commission and the representative, the Court notes that the State reported that under Law 26,691,302 sites that “operated as clandestine detention, torture, and extermination centers […] until December 10, 1983” were declared “Sites of Memory.” Among these “sites” is Automotores Orletti, where Ms. Grisonas Andrijauskaite, Anatole, and Victoria were held in custody. Likewise, Argentina indicated that in the House for the Right to Identity of the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo, located on the site where the Navy Mechanics Judgment of October 25, 2012. Series C No. 252, par. 357. See United Nations General Assembly, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, Fabián Salvioli, Apologies for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, UN Doc. A/74/147, July 12, 2019, pars. 13 and following. 298 See communication published by the Presidency of the Argentine Republic on March 24, 2004, entitled: “Palabras del Presidente de la Nación, Doctor Néstor Kirchner, en el acto de firma del convenio de la creación del Museo de la Memoria y para la Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos Humanos” (supra footnote 37), available at: https://www.casarosada.gob.ar/informacion/archivo/24549-blank-79665064. 299 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, par. 81, and Case of Guachalá Chimbo et al. v. Ecuador, supra, par. 239. 300 Cf. Case of Radilla Pacheco v. Mexico. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of November 23, 2009. Series C No. 209, par. 353, and Case of Garzón Guzmán et al. v. Ecuador, supra, par. 121. 301 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru, supra, par. 79, and Case of Garzón Guzmán et al. v. Ecuador, supra, par. 117. 302 Law No. 26,691, promulgated on July 27, 2011. Available at: http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/180000-184999/184962/norma.htm. 70