up emerging. Without understandable standards, and with insurmountable technological disparities between the parties, objective assessment of the evidence seems like a chimera. All in all, the question of truth has taken a leap that we could describe as extra-procedural. Indeed, what is happening today is the deliberate construction of a total parallel reality (neither true nor false in the classical sense of the word) by agents with specific interests, who not only do not hide their intentions (the Metaverse), but achieve the spontaneous collaboration of the subjects themselves "deceived" by this parallel reality, who, in a form of radical escapism, become complicit in its expansion: Instead of fleeing from reality, let us socially build a parallel one. This state of affairs cannot be dealt with in the courts because it both extends beyond and envelopes the legal process. Rather, it requires a public policy response. Thus, it acquires a dimension more of a social or collective right (such as peace or a healthy environment), rather than an individual guarantee. A state of affairs for which the individual solution is not satisfactory (extracting a situation, acts, or specific subjects from the parallel world to insert them (momentarily?) in the (real?) world of the legal process), but rather question structural elements of social relations.” We have followed Dr. De Cabo thus far and now use his important reflection as context. Ideology, cynicism, and post-truth Slavoj Žižek has started the discussion on how the classic version of ideology, which assumes that individuals are prevented from clearly knowing the reality in which they interact, has mutated into a much more sophisticated and complex—I would also say dangerous—version of ideology. A world where individuals perceive