14 286. International case law has established repeatedly that the judgment may constitute per se a form of reparation. Nevertheless, in its case law, the Court has developed the concept of non-pecuniary damage and has established that this “may include the suffering and afflictions caused to the direct victim and his next of kin, the impairment of values that are of great significance to the individual, and also the changes of a nonpecuniary nature in the living conditions of the victim or his family.” 287. Bearing in mind the circumstances of this case, the violations committed, the different degrees of suffering caused and experienced, the time that has elapsed, the denial of justice, and also the changes in the living conditions of some family members, the proven violations of the personal integrity of the victim’s family, and the other consequences of a non-pecuniary nature they suffered, the Court will now establish, in equity, the compensation for non-pecuniary damage in favor of the victims. 288. First, the Court considers that the circumstances that surrounded the detention and subsequent disappearance of Jeremías Osorio Rivera were such that they caused profound fear and suffering. In previous cases, the Inter-American Court has found that similar circumstances had caused the victim serious nonpecuniary harm that had to be assessed in its full dimension when establishing compensation for this concept. In light of these criteria, the Court considers that Jeremías Osorio Rivera should be compensated for nonpecuniary damage and orders, in equity, the payment of US$80,000.00 (eighty thousand United States dollars). Half this amount must be delivered to Santa Fe Gaitán Calderón, and the other half must be shared equally among the children of Jeremías Osorio Rivera, namely: Edith Laritza Osorio Gaytán, Neida Rocío Osorio Gaitán, Vannesa Judith Osorio Gaitán and Jersy Jeremías Osorio Gaitán. 289. Second, the Court finds that Santa Fe Gaitán Calderón, Edith Laritza Osorio Gaytán, Neida Rocío Osorio Gaitán, Vannesa Judith Osorio Gaitán and Jersy Jeremías Osorio Gaitán have experienced great suffering or their life projects were affected as a result of the enforced disappearance of Jeremías Osorio Rivera. Consequently, the Court establishes, in equity, the sum of US$45,000.00 (forty-five thousand United States dollars), for non-pecuniary damage, in favor of Santa Fe Gaitán Calderón, and of each child of Jeremías Osorio Rivera, namely: Edith Laritza Osorio Gaytán, Neida Rocío Osorio Gaitán, Vannesa Judith Osorio Gaitán and Jersy Jeremías Osorio Gaitán. 290. Lastly, considering the effects on their personal integrity suffered to different degrees as a result of the facts of this case, the Court establishes, in equity, the sum of US$20,000.00 (twenty thousand United States dollars) for Juana Rivera Lozano, and US$10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars) for each of the following siblings of Jeremías Osorio Rivera: Epifanía Alejandrina, Elena Máxima, Adelaida, Silvia, Mario and Efraín, all with the surnames Osorio Rivera. In addition, the Court establishes, in equity, the sum of US$45,000.00 (forty-five thousand United States dollars) for Porfirio Osorio Rivera, who has been the main promoter of the search for justice for the disappearance of his brother, Jeremías Osorio Rivera. 47. First, the Court notes that, as indicated by the State, its request is not related to a disagreement on the meaning or scope of the ruling ordered in the judgment regarding the specific case (supra paras. 5 and 43). Moreover, this Court considers that the preceding paragraphs, and in particular paragraphs 280, 283 and 287, clearly refer to the criteria used by the Court to determine the different concepts related to compensatory damages, based on the evidence provided, other similar precedents related to cases of enforced disappearance of persons, equity and reasonableness. Therefore, the Court does not deem it appropriate or necessary to make additional clarifications in this regard. V OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 48. Therefore, THE COURT, pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 31(3) and 68 of the Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: Unanimously,