Morales, after the death of Mr. Archila Pérez, she learned that "they had him in a punishment cell better known as 'Bartolina'" and that in that cell "he did not know dawn or dusk, they had him handcuffed by one hand, he went 40 days without food, water, or medicine, which led to depression and aggravated his state of health, in addition to being without communication with the other inmates. She also indicated that he was not given adequate medicine for his diabetes.106 The foregoing was also endorsed by Mr. Rodríguez Revolorio at the public hearing held before this Court, where she indicated that Mr. Archila Pérez "died 40 days after arriving at the Infiernito, he became depressed, he became ill with diabetes and was never given the proper medicine for the illness he had".107 Mr. Archila Pérez died on July 16, 1999 as a result of diabetic ketoacidosis,108 that is, an acute complication of diabetes. (iv) Conclusions 86. The Court observes, first of all, that it had the opportunity to analyze the physical conditions of the "El Infiernito" prison during the period in which Mr. Rodríguez Revolorio and Mr. López Calo were also detained109 in the case of Fermín Ramírez v. Guatemala, where it observed the following: "The High Security Prison in Escuintla presents poor hygiene conditions and lacks water and ventilation, especially during the summer.73 The sector in which Mr. Fermín Ramírez is located is of approximately 20 meters by 6 and 8 meters and has 40 cement beds. In the sector there are close to 40 prisoners, some of them facing the death penalty and others face sentences of 30 to 50 years in prison. There are no adequate educational or sports programs. Medical and psychological assistance is deficient”.110 87. The Court further notes that Mr. Fermín Ramírez had been subjected to "grave prison conditions," which were part of a general context of serious prison deficiencies, as noted by international organizations.111 For all of the above reasons, the Court considered that the State violated Articles 5(1) and 5(2) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of the Convention.112 88. Without prejudice to the foregoing, the Court also considers that from the body of evidence in the instant case, it can also be concluded that the "El Infiernito" prison where Mr. Rodríguez Revolorio, Mr. López Calo and Mr. Archila Pérez were held did indeed have deficient physical and sanitary conditions that in no way met international standards.113 In this sense, the Court has him nor did I believe he was sick, that is why I wanted to see him and I did not want them to kill him in there [...]" (Statement rendered before a notary public by Irma Morales Moratava de Archilla, of March 1, 2019, evidence file, folio 2438). 106 Cf. Statement rendered before a notary public by Irma Morales Moratava de Archilla, of March 1, 2019 (evidence file, folio 2439). 107 Cf. Testimony of Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Revolorio given at the public hearing before the Inter-American Court held on March 8, 2019. 108 Death certificate of Aníbal Archila Pérez issued by the Civil Registry of the Municipality of Escuintla, death no. 6468 (evidence file, folio 1329). 109 Cf. Case of Fermín Ramírez v. Guatemala, supra, para. 54.55. 110 Cf. Case of Fermín Ramírez v. Guatemala, supra, para. 54.57. 111 See also, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Fifth Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Guatemala, April 6, 2001, Chapter VIII; and MINUGUA, Verification Report, The Prison Situation in Guatemala, April 2000. 112 Cf. Case of Fermín Ramírez v. Guatemala, supra, para. 119. 113 The Inter-American Court in numerous decisions has used the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Mandela Rules) to interpret the content of the right of persons deprived of their liberty to humane and dignified treatment. These prescribe the basic standards for the accommodation, hygiene, medical treatment and exercise of prisoners deprived of their liberty. Cf. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, adopted by the First United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, held in Geneva in 1995, and approved by the Economic and Social Council in its resolutions 663C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXVII) of 13 May 1977, inter alia: "10. All accommodation provided for the use of prisoners and in particular all sleeping accommodation shall 25