3. Luis Humberto Córdova Ramos, a lieutenant of the Traffic Commission of Ecuador, who will testify on the alleged fact that the Traffic Commission offered operations though Cuban doctors in the year 2000. C) Expert witnesses proposed by the representative 1. Ignacio Hanna Musse, university professor and personal physician of Mrs. Suárez, who will refer to the treatment followed by the victim in recent years and the treatment she should follow in future; 2. Iván Castro Patiño, former Dean of the Faculty of Law of the Catholic University of Santiago de Guayaquil, who will testify on the guarantees of due process, the procedural initiative of the State in the investigation of a crime and the consequences for the State of impunity in a case, and 3. Hugo Miguel Morán Sánchez, an accounting expert, who will testify on the calculation of the expenses for pecuniary damages incurred by the victim until now. D) Expert witnesses proposed by the State 1. Verónica Valencia, Head of Psychiatric Services at the Eugenio Espejo Hospital, who will testify on psychiatric intervention models in preoperative, peri-operative and post-operative procedures, and 2. Jaysoon Abarca, Head of the Gastroenterology Service of the Eugenio Espejo Hospital, who will refer to diagnostic, emergency and surgical procedures in gastroenterology in Ecuador. 2. To require the representative and the State to submit, if considered pertinent and within the non-renewable term that expires on January 11, 2013, any questions considered appropriate through the Inter-American Court to the alleged victim, the witnesses and expert witnesses mentioned in operative paragraph 1 of this Order. The statements and expert opinions required in Operative paragraph 1 must be submitted no later than February 1, 2013. 3. To require the representative, the State, the Commission and the Secretariat of the Court to coordinate and make the necessary arrangements so that once the respective questions of the parties have been received, the deponents and expert witnesses may include the respective answers in their statements rendered by affidavit, under the terms of Considering paragraphs 32 and 33 of this Order. 4. To require the Secretariat of the Court, once the statements and expert opinions required in Operative paragraph 1 have been received, to transmit them to the parties and to the Commission, together with the expert opinions included in this case (supra Considering paragraph 14), so that they can submit their observations to those statements and expert opinions, respectively, with their final arguments, at the latest. 5. To summon the representative, the State and the Inter-American Commission to a public hearing to be held on February 11, 2013 from 9:00 hours to 13:00 hours, during the Court’s 98th Regular Period of Sessions in the city of San Jose, Costa Rica, in order to receive their final oral arguments and final oral observations, respectively, 12