the National Institute of Concessions responded to a communication sent by the Prosecutor’s Office requesting a copy of the videos taken at tolls on the Bogotá-Villavicencio road. In this communication, the institute stated that “the recordings made at the tolls are only kept for a maximum of thirty days, and therefore we are unable to comply with your request.” 85 47. On July 27, 2010, the Prosecutor’s Office ordered the taking of a supplemental statement from journalist Jineth Bedoya “who, on that same date, was informed of the current status of the investigation.” 86 The journalist provided her statement on August 11. 87 Based on Jineth Bedoya’s statement, on August 12, 2010, the Prosecutor’s Office ordered new evidentiary proceedings, including the taking of a statement from Jhon Jairo Velázquez Vásquez, alias “Popeye.” 88 This statement was provided on September 9, 2010. 89 On November 12, 2010 a new CTI report was added to the case file, 90 but there is no indication that any further action has been taken based on the information provided by the declarant. 48. In these ten years, the investigation never went beyond the preliminary investigation stage. 49. In January 2011, Jineth Bedoya became a civil party to the case, and on April 12 and 20, through her legal representatives, requested clarification on the progress of the preliminary investigation. 91 On April 14 92 and 29, 93 2011, the Prosecutor’s Office responded to the civil party’s request and ordered the production of certain evidence, including “taking a preliminary statement from General Leonardo Gallego,” as well as a supplemental statement from Mario Jaimes Mejia, alias “El Panadero.” On May 4, the civil party 94 reiterated her April 20, 2011 request for evidence. 95 On May 6, the CTI added its report on the evidence taken, 96 and on May 16 the Prosecutor’s Office issued a decision both admitting and denying evidence requested by the civil party, 97 and the following day the civil party filed motions for the reconsideration and appeal of that decision. On May 23, a statement was provided by Mario Jaimes Mejía, who said he was willing to tell the justice authorities everything he knew about what happened to journalist Jineth Bedoya, “as long as the demands made to INPEC are met.” 98 General Gallego did not appear on the scheduled date and the proceeding was postponed; General Oscar Naranjo's statement was also not received on time. On June 8, 2011, the Prosecutor’s Office issued a resolution on the motion for reconsideration filed by the civil party and ordered the evidence she had requested. 99 On June 22, 2011 the Prosecutor’s Office ordered Jineth Bedoya to provide a statement in order to Annex 62. National Institute of Concessions. Communication to the Prosecutions Assistant II UNHR and IHL, dated February 8, 2010. Annex to the communication of the petitioners received on June 20, 2011. 86 Annex 63. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated July 27, 2010. Case 807. C4, p. 34. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 87 Annex 64. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Supplementary complaint filed by Jineth Bedoya Lima. August 11, 2010. Case 807. C4, pp. 41-42. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 88 Annex 65. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated August 12, 2010. Case 807. C4, p. 44. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 89 Annex 66. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Statement of Jhon Jairo Velázquez Vásquez dated September 9, 2010. Case 807. C4, pp. 48-52. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 90 Annex 67. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. CTI. Report No. 571005 dated November 12, 2010. Case 807. C4, unnumbered. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 91 Annex 68. Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa. Communications of April 12 and 19, 2011. Case 807. C4, pp. 120-137. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 92 Annex 69. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated April 14, 2010. Case 807. C4, pp. 118. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 93 Annex 70. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated April 29, 2010. Case 807. C4, pp. 139-140. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 94 Annex 71. Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa. Communication of May 2, 2011. Case 807. C4, pp. 144-151. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 95 Annex 72. Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa. Communication dated May 4, 2011. Case 807. C4, pp. 153-172. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 96 Annex 73. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. CTI. Report No. 602029 dated April 29, 2011. Case 807. C4, pp. 173-176. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 97 Annex 74. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated April 29, 2011. Case 807. C4, pp. 191-198. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 98 Annex 75. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Statement of Mario Jaimes Mejia dated May 24, 2011. Case 807. C4, pp. 229230. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 99 Annex 76. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated June 8, 2011. Case 807. C4, pp. 243-246. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 85 12