34. A new report was received from the CTI on June 20, 2000, and the gynecological exams performed on Jineth Bedoya, as well as her clinical history, were incorporated into the file. 45 On September 1, 2000, the Institute of Forensic Medicine sent the results of the journalist’s urine tests to the Prosecutor’s Office. 35. Another CTI report was received on October 3, 2000, on proceedings ordered on June 19, including statements by alias “Popeye” and the warden of the National Model Prison. 46 Based on this report, the Prosecutor ordered new proceedings on October 4, including the taking of statements from a guerrilla member in La Picota prison and from the deputy warden of the National Model Prison, and a judicial inspection of the disciplinary proceedings carried out by the Office of the Inspector General of Colombia into what happened. On November 22 47 and December 13 48 and 20, 49 2000, the CTI sent reports containing information on the proceedings conducted at the Prosecutor’s request. 36. On January 23 50 and April 18, 2001, 51 the Prosecutor’s Office once again ordered that a number of proceedings be conducted. The CTI reported on the completion of those proceedings on February 2, 52 April 26, 53 and December 10, 2001. 54 37. On April 1, 2002, the newspaper El Espectador was instructed via official letter to send a copy of Jineth Bedoya’s employment contract. 55 The newspaper replied to the request on April 12. 56 On August 28, 2002, the Prosecutor’s Office issued an official letter stating that it had not received “any information about the investigations carried out by the CTI investigators supporting this investigation with a view to clarifying the facts” and ordered the investigators to submit a report on the work they had carried out. 57 38. The CTI submitted the requested report on April 1, 2003. 58 That report presents data gathered from interviews with alias Popeye and journalist Jineth Bedoya, which point to the possible motives for the crimes and the alleged responsibility of members paramilitary groups and State intelligence agencies. The report notes, in particular, that according to alias Popeye, “No member of the self-defense groups had any responsibility for the kidnapping of the journalist; for them, those responsible for what happened were the 45 Annex 23. Office of the National Prosecutor General. CTI. Report No. 03342 FGN-DNCTI-SI-DE-C3-4-Z3 and attached documents (Opinion 398-EZ-LBF2000SME of the National Forensic Medicine and Sciences Institute dated June 2, 2000, and Official Communication HOCEN.BIO.EST/447 No. 1158 dated May 31 with a photocopy of the medical record of Jineth Bedoya Lima). June 20, 2000. Case 807. C1, pp. 162-163. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 46 Annex 24. Office of the National Prosecutor General. CTI (illegible date). Mission No 3612.00 GDH. Report on resolution proceedings dated June 19, 2000. Case 807. C2, pp. 181-187. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 47 Annex 25. Office of the National Prosecutor General. CTI. Report No. 178-2000. Mission No 123-2000. Report on resolution proceedings dated November 8, 2000. Case 807. C2, pp. 220-263. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 48 Annex 26. Office of the National Prosecutor General. CTI. Report No. 183-2000. Mission No 123-2000. Case 807. C2, pp. 265-266. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 49 Annex 27. Office of the National Prosecutor General. CTI. Report (illegible document number and date). Mission No. 4799. Case 807. C2, pp. 361-364. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 50 Annex 28. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated January 23, 2001. Case 807. C2, p. 377. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 51 Annex 29. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated April 18, 2001. Case 807. C3, p. 1. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 52 Annex 30. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Photo array. February 2, 2001. Case 807. C2, p. 379. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 53 Annex 31. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Statement of Arle Olaya. April 26, 2001. Case 807. C3, pp. 6-9. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 54 Annex 32. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Official Communication FGN CTI GDH 0039422/C6. December 10. Transmission of Report No. 6191 by the CTI. Case 807. C3, pp. 12-16. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 55 Annex 33. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated April 1, 2002. Case 807. C3, p. 17. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 56 Annex 34. Newspaper El Espectador. UNDH. Note of April 12, 2002, and annexes. Case 807. C3, pp. 20-24. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 57 Annex 35. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Resolution dated August 28, 2002 and Official Communication No. 155. Case 807. C3, pp. 26-7. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 58 Annex 36. Office of the National Prosecutor General. UNDH. Report No. 01429 dated April 1, 2003. Case 807. C3, pp. 30-35. Annex 12 to the communication of the petitioner received on May 29, 2015. 9