8
statement was about, inter alia, the profile of his brother; the family life
before his disappearance; the actions taken to know the truth of what
happened; the consequences the disappearance of his brother and the alleged
lack of justice had for his personal and family life;
b)
Victor Manuel Quinteros Marquina, witness proposed by the representatives
and investigator for the book of Mr. Ricardo Uceda entitled “Muerte en el
Pentagonito.” He rendered a statement about, inter alia, the disappearance of
Anzualdo Castro and what he knew about the case;
c)
Javier Roca Obregón, witness proposed by the representatives. His statement
was about the relevance of the disappearance of his son, Martin Javier Roca
Casas, in relation to the disappearance of Kenneth Ney Anzualdo Castro, as
well as the manner in which he made contact with Kenneth and the assistance
he provided to shed light on the whereabouts of his son;
d)
Santiago Cristóbal Alvarado Santos, witness proposed by the representatives
and driver of the bus in which Kenneth Ney Anzualdo Castro was travelling on
the day of his disappearance; he declared about the incident that occurred on
December 16, 1993 when several people intercepted the vehicle he was
driving and three of the passengers were forced to get out of the bus,
including Mr. Anzualdo;
e)
Carlos Alberto Jibaja Zárate, expert witness proposed by the representatives,
bachelor’s degree in Clinical Psychology and Executive Director of the Center
for Psychosocial Care, in Lima, Peru. While giving his opinion, he analyzed the
psychological effects produced on the family of Kenneth Ney Anzualdo Castro
after his disappearance and before the alleged lack of the State’s response in
that regard, and
f)
Carlos Martín Rivera Paz10, witness proposed by the representatives, Lawyer
and Vice-President of the Legal Defense Institute [Instituto de Defensa Legal],
a non-governmental organization. He rendered a statement about the
different aspects of the special legal system of Peru and the necessary
measures to repair the damages.
23.
As to the evidence produced at the public hearing, the Court heard the
testimonies rendered by the following people:
a)
Felix Vicente Anzualdo Vicuña, proposed by the Commission, father of
Kenneth Ney Anzualdo Castro and alleged victim in the instant case; he
declared about, inter alia, the effects produced by the disappearance of his
son and the lack of identification and punishment of the responsible, as well
as the effects that these facts had on his family;
b)
Marly Arleny Anzualdo Castro, proposed by the representatives, sister of
Kenneth Ney Anzualdo Castro and alleged victim in the instant case. She
rendered a statement about the family relationship before the disappearance
of his brother; the measures she adopted, as well as the State's response, to
establish the fate or whereabouts of his brother or the location and
identification of his mortal remains; and the consequences that such
10
Even though Mr. Rivera Paz was convened to render a statement at the hearing, the
representatives requested the Court to accept his declaration by means of an affidavit. This has not been
challenged by the parties.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents