9 25. However, the Tribunal considers that, by virtue of the apparent “extraordinary” risk the Rodríguez Quintero brothers face and the agreement between the parties regarding the maintenance of provisional measures in the brothers’ favor, there persists a prima facie situation of extreme gravity and urgency that could lead to irreparable harm to Messers Rodríguez Quintero and their families. The Court also observes that the truth of certain facts alleged by the representatives such as the supposed threat received on July 5, 2009, and the allegedly intimidating visit of November 6, 2009 (supra Considering clauses 15(a) and 15(b)), has not been sufficiently clarified, despite the events having occurred while the State’s special security measures were in effect. 26. Thus, this Court considers it necessary to maintain the provisional measures currently in effect in order to protect the life and personal integrity of Wilmar Rodríguez Quintero, Yimmy Efraín Rodríguez Quintero, Nubia Saravia, Karen Dayana Rodríguez Saravia, Valeria Rodríguez Saravia, and William Rodríguez Quintero. 27. Lastly, owing to the aforementioned considerations, the Tribunal finds it necessary that both, the State and the representatives, present detailed and complete information on the beneficiaries’ situation within the time frames established in the Operative Paragraphs of the present Order. In particular, the Court requests that the State submit to it information on any risk assessment studies that have been carried out, accompanied by documentation supporting the study and its results as well as the specific security measures that should be implemented in accordance with these results. In order for this to occur, the beneficiaries and the representatives must give the State their full cooperation. The Court also asks that the representatives submit their observations regarding the protective measures the State has thus far implemented in fulfillment of the current provisional measures. 28. Additionally, the Court asks that the Commission and the representatives submit their observations to the State’s assessments within the time frame established for that purpose. 2. Regarding the situation faced by Salomón Flórez Contreras, Sandra Belinda Montero Fuentes, Luis José Pundor Quintero, and their respective families 29. The representatives reported that the beneficiaries Salomón Flórez Contreras, Sandra Belinda Montero Fuentes, Luis José Pundor Quintero, and their families expressed their desire not to participate in an eventual risk assessment study “owing to the lack of trust they feel towards any member of the army and police.” In particular, regarding these three beneficiaries and their families, they indicated that: a. Salomón Flórez Contreras, by means of a telephone conversation with his wife, informed the representatives that he and his family had not had any recent problems with their personal security and that, for this reason, they did not wish to have any contact whatsoever with members of the army or the police. b. Sandra Belinda Montero Fuentes, also over the telephone, informed the representatives that she had not had any particular problems with her personal security either, and thusly, “in [that] moment she was at peace and did not require protection.” Regarding her family, she indicated that her daughter, Sandra Katerine Ayala Montero, had decided to leave the country because of threats she received in 2004; meanwhile her youngest daughter, María Paula Casanova Montero, was living with her while her