g) to pay the moratory interest on the compensation awarded for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damages and reimburse costs and expenses (operative paragraphs fifteen, sixteen and seventeen of the Judgment). 3. The briefs of February 4, April 3 and December 30, 2009, and March 15, 2010, whereby the Republic of Paraguay (hereinafter "the State" or "Paraguay") reported on compliance with the Judgment (supra Having Seen 1). 4. The briefs of September 14, 2009 and May 4, 2010, whereby the representatives of the victims (hereinafter "the representatives") presented their observations on the report submitted by the State (supraHaving Seen 5). 5. The brief of December 10, 2010, whereby the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Inter-American Commission" or "the Commission") submitted its observations on the State report (supraHaving Seen 3). 6. The briefs of the Secretariat of February 19 and March 24, 2010, whereby, following the instructions of the plenary of the Court, it responded to the consultation filed by the State on December 30, 2009 on "the criteria followed by [the Court] to calculate the interest accrued in the [present] case." 7. The Order issued by the President of the Court (hereinafter "the President") on July 20, 2010, whereby he summoned the State, representatives and the Commission to a private audience in order to receive full and up-to-date information from the State on the implementation of the reparation measures ordered in the Judgment that are outstanding (supra Having Seen 2) and listen to the observations of the Commission and the representatives. 8. The private hearing held by the Court at its headquarters in San Jose, Costa Rica, September 2, 2010.1 9. The report of September 20, 2010, whereby the State provided the information requested in the aforementioned hearing, and the comments of representatives on the brief submitted on October 1, 2010. 10. The briefs of the Secretariat of September 8 and 22 and October 21, 2010, whereby, following the President of the Court, requested the Commission presented its comments on the State report and the comments of the representatives (supra Having Seen 9), which had not been received on the date this Order was issued. CONSIDERING: 1. Monitoring compliance with its decisions is an inherent power to the jurisdictional functions of the Court. 1 At this hearing, the following were in attendance: a) representing the Inter-American Commission: Lilly Ching Soto, specialist for the Executive Secretary b) for the representatives of the victims: Liliana Tojo (CEJIL), and c) for the State of Paraguay: Salvador Meden Peláez, Chargé d'Affaires of the Embassy of Paraguay in Costa Rica; Nury Montiel, Director of Human Rights of the Supreme Court, and Gustavo Dávalos, Major of Military Justice and Representative of the Ministry of National Defense.