3 5. To determine the scope of the provisions of paragraph No. 188 of the Judgment on the merits, reparations, and costs delivered on July 4, 2007, under the terms of 4 paragraph No. 34 of the Judgment [on Interpretation]. […] 3. The brief of December 26, 2007, by which the Republic of Colombia (hereinafter, the “State” or “Colombia”) considered that “it […] should not publish in any newspaper the name of [the] people, who have not been convicted by the criminal courts, since it would be like they were being marked as individually responsible for some crimes, when no condemnatory judgment has been issued yet”. 4. The note of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter, the “Secretariat”) of February 7, 2008, by means of which, following the instructions of the Tribunal, it informed the State that it was authorized to refrain from making public the complete names of the people indicated in the pertinent paragraphs of the Judgment”. 5. The briefs of February 23, August 25 and September 23, 2009, and April 28, 2010, by means of which the State informed on the progress made in the compliance with the Judgment. 6. The briefs of April 23 and October 28, 2009, by means of which the representatives presented their observations to the State’s reports. 7. The briefs of May 8, October 29 and November 5, 2009, whereby the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter, the “Commission” or the "Inter-American Commission") submitted its observations to the report of the State and the briefs presented by the representatives. 8. The Order of the Court’s President of April 29, 2010 by means of which it convened the State, the representatives and the Inter-American Commission to a private hearing on monitoring compliance with the Judgment, in order to analyze the implementation of the measure of reparation ordered in operative paragraph twelve of the Judgment, related to the medical, psychiatric and psychological treatment, as well as similar measures of reparation ordered in another seven cases5. 9. The private hearing on monitoring compliance held on May 22, 2010 at the seat of the Tribunal6. 4 The Court indicated, in the Judgment on Interpretation, in that respect, that: 34. […] [H]as noted that according to the above paragraph it is clear that it is Etelvina Zapata who must receive payment of the amount set as costs and expenses. Such payment may be personally collected by her or a person appointed by her for that purpose, pursuant to the provisions of applicable domestic legislation. 5 Case of the 19 Tradesmen V. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Legal Costs. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C Nº 109; Case of Gutierrez Soler V. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Legal Costs. Judgment of September 12, 2005. Series C Nº 132; Case of the “Mapiripán Massacre” V. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Legal Costs. Judgment of September 15, 2005. Series C Nº 134. Case of the Massacre of Pueblo Bello V. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Legal Costs. Judgment of January 31, 2006. Series C N°140; Case of the Ituango Massacres V. Colombia. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Legal Costs. Judgment of July 1, 2006. Series C Nº 148; Case of the Rochela Massacre V. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Legal Costs. Judgment of May 11, 2007. Series C N ° 163 and case of Valle Jaramillo et al V. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Legal Costs. Judgment of November 27, 2008. Series C N° 192. 6 To the private hearing, there appeared: a) on behalf of the Colombian State: Vice Minister of Multilateral Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Adriana Mejía Hernández; Technical Vice Minister of the Ministry of Social Protection, Carlos Jorge Rodriguez; Director of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ángela Margarita Rey Anaya; Head of the International Cooperation and Foreign Relations Office of the Ministry of Social Protection, Gloria Beatriz Gaviria; Management National Leader of CAPRECOM, Diego Romero and Coordinator of the Inter-institutional Operative Group, Felipe Medina Ardila; b) on behalf of the victims'

Select target paragraph3