the testimony of the next of kin of Ms. Oviedo Bonilla, at the 13th Brigade “one of the soldiers who was on guard approached and [told her sister] not to give up, to continue coming because she was there.” 390 Also, the next of kin of Lucy Amparo Oviedo Bonilla and Irma Franco Pineda were advised, specifically, that the disappeared were dead and had been buried in a mass grave. 391 Thus, the next of kin of at least seven disappeared victims (Cristina del Pilar Guarín Cortés, Carlos Augusto Rodríguez Vera, David Suspes Celis, Irma Franco Pineda, Héctor Jaime Beltrán Fuentes, Gloria Anzola de Lanao and Lucy Amparo Oviedo Bonilla) received information following the events indicating that their family members were detained in military garrisons. 392 employee denied any knowledge of this and asserted that all her previous statements and the information given to Lucy Amparo Oviedo Bonilla’s husband were based on her own suppositions and in order to give spiritual comfort to the victims’ next of kin. In this regard, the Third Court assessed the information provided by the next of kin and concluded that, “there had to be a reason why the information [provided by the Ministry of Defense employee] changed completely from one moment to another.” Meanwhile, the Superior Court considered that the information received by Ms. Oviedo Bonilla’s family was “inconsistent,” and it was not “logical that [a person with administrative functions] had obtained [that] information.” Cf. Testimony of Luz Dary Semper Bedoya of December 21, 1985, before the Ninth Itinerant Criminal Investigation Court (evidence file, folio 28246); Testimony of Antonio Suspes Pérez of January 8, 1986, before the Ninth Itinerant Criminal Investigation Court (evidence file, folio 28230); expansion of the criminal complaint of Héctor Jaime Beltrán on August 29, 2001 (evidence file, folio 1122); expansion of the complaint of María del Pilar Navarrete Urrea on August 29, 2001 (evidence file, folio 28889); Extract from the testimony of Cecilia Cabrera of November 25, 1985, in the judgment of the Superior Court of Bogota of January 30, 2012 (evidence file, folio 23213); Testimony of Oscar Anzola Mora of February 3, 1986, before the Ninth Itinerant Criminal Investigation Court (evidence file, folio 30003); extracts from the testimony of the next of kin and of Gloria Anzola in the judgment of the Superior Court of Bogota of January 30, 2012 (evidence file, folio 23105); Testimony of Ana María Bonilla de Oviedo of April 2, 1986, before the 30th Itinerant Criminal Investigation Court (evidence file, folio 30970); Testimony of Jairo Arias Méndez of December 19, 1985, before the Ninth Itinerant Criminal Investigation Court (evidence file, folios 29625 and 29626); Testimony of Rafael María Oviedo of December 18, 1985, before the Ninth Itinerant Criminal Investigation Court (evidence file, folios 29651 and 29652); Testimony of Emiliano Sánchez Zuluaga of December 26, 1985, before the Ninth Itinerant Criminal Investigation Court (evidence file, folios 29605 to 29607); Testimony of Jorge Eliécer Franco Pineda of August 14, 2006, before the Prosecution Service (evidence file, 28983 and 28984); Judgment of the Third Criminal Court of the Bogota Special Circuit of June 9, 2010 (evidence file, folio 24051), and Judgment of the Superior Court of Bogota of January 30, 2012 (evidence file, folios 23163 and 23164). 390 Cf. Testimony of Armida Eufemia Oviedo Bonilla of June 24, 2008, before the Prosecution Service (evidence file, folio 29575). 391 In this regard, an Army officer, who was crying told Irma Franco Pineda’s brother: “don’t go on insisting”; “they kept them in the stables at Usaquén for eight days, then they killed them, and the corpses of almost all of them were taken to the mass grave in the South Cemetery, but that of Irma and that of a Ms. Anzola were separated and taken to the mass grave in the Chapinero Cemetery, considering that their families might go public and react in other ways.” Cf. Testimony of Jorge Eliécer Franco Pineda of August 14, 2006, before the Prosecution Service (evidence file, folio 28983); letter addressed to the judges of the Special Investigative Court Criminal by Rafael María Oviedo Acevedo and Ana María Bonilla de Oviedo dated December 2, 1985 (evidence file, folio 29664), and Testimony of Rafael María Oviedo Acevedo of December 18, 1985 (evidence file, folio 30389). 392 The Court also observes that the representatives provided as evidence the transcript of a cassette made by the Attorney General’s office in which presumed “[agents] of the B-2 and of the State’s intelligence services” who took part in the retaking of the Palace of Justice stated that 12 or 13 individuals had been “taken immediately to the premises of the Cavalry School in the North Canton, and the Military Institutes Brigade north of Bogota.” In the cassette, mention is made of the names of “David Celis, Jaime Beltrán, […] Hernando Fernández […] and Carlos Rodríguez”, as well as of Luz Marina or Luz María or Luz Mery Puerta, Luz Mery Puerta or Luz María A. Puerta, Nohora Esguera […] and Rosa or Margarita […] Castiblanco, who were “detained in another military facility.” In this regard, the State alleged that “its content is not consistent with the other evidence gathered in relation to the events, and also the recording is not available for verification, because there is only a transcript of its content.” The Court notes that two first instance criminal courts have accorded probative value to this cassette. However, in its judgment of January 30, 2012, the Superior Court of Bogota determined that “its content is not credible,” among other reasons because, when Carlos Augusto Rodríguez Vera’s father heard the cassette, he stated that he did “not accord much credibility to the fact that it originated from the B-2, because in some of the photocopies that [they] deposited in the hospitals, clinics and prisons requesting information on the disappeared, the name of the waiter, Bernardo Beltran Hernandez, appeared with two typing errors and the initial of the name and second surname were interchanged, and when [he] was given the name of this cafeteria employee […] no one associated it with his real name, but said Hernando Fernandez.” In addition, the same photocopy included “the telephone number of a friend of my children,” and this is the same number that was provided to Carlos Augusto’s father when they called him to offer him the cassette. The 90