CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

IHR Court. Aroca Palma et al. v. Ecuador. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 8, 2022. Judgment adopted in San Jose, Costa Rica. Ricardo C. Perez Manrique President Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Poisot Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Nancy Hernández López Veronica Gómez Patricia Pérez Goldberg Rodrigo Mudrovitsch Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar So ordered, Ricardo C. Perez Manrique President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar 32

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
13Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND CAUSE OF ACTION4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT4
III JURISDICTION6
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTION6
A. Arguments of the parties and the Commission6
B. Considerations of the Court7
V EVIDENCE 8
A. Admissibility of documentary evidence8
B. Admissibility of testimonial and expert evidence8
VI FACTS8
A. Joffre Antonio Aroca Palma and his family9
B. The events of February 27, 20019
C. Domestic proceedings under the ordinary and police jurisdictions10
D. The inclusion of the “Joffre Aroca” case in the Truth Commission’s report13
E. Actions of Ecuador’s Public Prosecution Service following publication of the Truth Commission’s report14
VIII MERITS14
VIII.1 RIGHTS TO LIFE, PERSONAL INTEGRITY AND PERSONAL LIBERTY, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS14
A. Arguments of the Commission and of the parties14
A.1. Right to personal liberty14
A.2. Right to life15
A.3. Right to personal integrity16
B. Considerations of the Court17
B.1. Right to personal liberty17
B.2. Right to life18
B.3. Right to personal integrity19
B.4. General conclusion20
VIII.2 RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION,READ IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT ANDGUARANTEE RIGHTS AND ADOPT DOMESTIC REMEDIES20
A. Arguments of the Commission and of the parties20
B. Considerations of the Court21
VIII.3 RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY OF THE MEMBERS OFJOFFRE ANTONIO AROCA PALMA’S FAMILY, IN RELATION TOTHE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS23
A. Arguments of the Commission and of the parties23
B. Considerations of the Court23
IX REPARATIONS24
A. Injured party25
B. Obligation to investigate25
C. Measures of rehabilitation requested26
D. Measures of satisfaction requested26
E. Other measures requested27
F. Compensation28
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS30

Aroca Palma y otros. Judgment. November 8, 2022

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Nov 8, 2022

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: c 471

Country

Colombia

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Nancy Hernández López
Patricia Pérez Goldberg
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique
Rodrigo de Bittencourt Mudrovitsch
Verónica Gómez

Primary Documents

Aroca Palma y otros. Judgment. November 8, 2022.pdf
English
Download View
Aroca Palma y otros. Sentencia de 8 de noviembre de 2022.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Aroca Palma y otros. Judgment. November 8, 2022.docx172.95 kB

Aroca Palma y otros. Sentencia de 8 de noviembre de 2022.docx117.62 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No Label1
- Case1
IACourt Documents3
- Order of the President IACHR1
- Hearing1
- Order of the IACourt1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
País1
- Country1
Signatories7
- Judge and/or Commissioners7

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.