ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF APRIL 20, 2010 CASE OF THE SARAMAKA PEOPLE V. SURINAME MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the InterAmerican Court,” “the Court,” or “the Tribunal”) on November 28, 2007, in which it: DECLARE[D], Unanimously, that: 1. [t]he State violated, to the detriment of the members of the Saramaka people, the right to property, as recognized in Article 21 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the obligations to respect, ensure, and to give domestic legal effect to said right, in accordance with Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, in the terms of the paragraphs 78 to 158 of th[e] [J]udgment. 2. [t]he State violated, to the detriment of the members of the Saramaka people, the right to juridical personality established in Article 3 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the right to property recognized in Article 21 of such instrument and the right to judicial protection under Article 25 thereof, as well as in connection to the obligations to respect, ensure, and to give domestic legal effect to those rights, in accordance with Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, in the terms of paragraphs 159 to 175 of th[e] [J]udgment. 3. [t]he State violated, to the detriment of the members of the Saramaka people, the right to judicial protection, as recognized in Article 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with the obligations to respect and guarantee the rights established under Articles 21 and 1(1) thereof, in the terms of paragraphs 176 to 185 of th[e] [J]udgment. AND DECIDE[D], Unanimously, that: […] 5. [t]he State shall delimit, demarcate, and grant collective title over the territory of the members of the Saramaka people, in accordance with their customary laws, and through previous, effective[,] and fully informed consultations with the Saramaka people, without prejudice to other tribal and indigenous communities. Until said delimitation, demarcation, and titling of the Saramaka territory has been carried out, Suriname must abstain from acts which might lead […] agents of the State […] or third parties acting with its acquiescence or its toleranc[e] to affect the existence, value, use[,] or enjoyment of the territory to which the members of the Saramaka people are entitled, unless the State obtains the free, informed[,] and prior consent of the Saramaka people. With regar[d] to the concessions already granted within traditional Saramaka territory, the State must review the[m] in light of the […] Judgment and the Court’s jurisprudence, in order to evaluate whether a modification of the rights of the concessionaires is necessary in order to preserve the survival of the Saramaka people, in the terms of paragraphs 101, 115, 129-137, 143, 147, 155, 157, 158, and 194(a) of th[e] Judgment[;] 6. [t]he State shall grant the members of the Saramaka people legal recognition of the collective juridical capacity, pertaining to the community to which they belong, with the purpose of ensuring the full exercise and enjoyment of their right to communal property, as well as collective access to justice, in accordance with their communal