3 And decided: […] To urge the State to adopt all necessary measures to comply promptly and effectively with the reparations ordered in the Judgments of January 24, 1998, and January 22, 1999, which are pending compliance, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. […] 5. The briefs submitted on May 7, 2004 and August 17, 2005, whereby the State of Guatemala (hereinafter, the “State”) informed that: a. “the regional delegate of [the Presidential Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "COPREDEH”) visited the Criminal Investigation Section […] in the Department of Huehuetenango [and] requested information from the Prosecution Office of the District in order to obtain information regarding the progress made to effectively apprehend Mr. Candelario López Herrera, Hipólito Ramos Garcia and Mario Cano Saucedo, but had no positive answer up to the moment". Furthermore, it noted that “notwithstanding the efforts made by the State of Guatemala, through its competent authorities, in order to comply with the apprehension orders issued against Mr. Candelario López Herrera, Hipólito Ramos García and Mario Cano Saucedo, the whereabouts of the accused could not be determined”. At the moment, the criminal action against Mario Cano Saucedo and Hipólito Ramos García is under investigation and, b. “the conviction of Mr. Vicente Cifuentes López for the crime of murder which sentenced him to 28 years of immutable imprisonment […] is final," that as a consequence of "having declared unfounded the Appeal filed by the defense.” 6. The notes of July 1, 2004 and September 30, 2005, by which the InterAmerican Commission of Human Rights (hereinafter, the “Commission” or the “InterAmerican Commission”) submitted its observations to the reports presented by the State (supra, Having Seen clause 5). In said notes, “the Commission acknowledge[d] the efforts made by the State […] as to the affirmation [...] of the conviction against Mr. Vicente Cifuentes López [and observed that] there has been no progress as to the obligation to investigate, prosecute and punish the responsible in the instant case". Furthermore, it pointed out that "the State fails to indicate [...] the type and date of the proceedings carried out to execute the apprehension orders" issued against Mr. Candelario López Herrera, Hipólito Ramos García and Mario Cano Saucedo and that it just "confirms that the corresponding apprehensions have not been executed." Thus, it requested the Court to order the State “to adopt, immediately and specifically, all the measures necessarily to comply with the obligation to investigate, prosecute and punish the responsible of the violations of human rights as declared by the Court in the [instant] case.” 7. The Order issued by the President of the Inter-American Court (hereinafter, the “President of the Court”) on October 29, 2007, whereby, in exercise of the Court’s power to monitor compliance with its decisions, in consultation with the other Judges of the Tribunal and pursuant to Articles 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter, the "American Convention" or the "Convention") it was decided to summon the Inter-American Commission, the