unanimously, DECIDES, 1. To reject the preliminary objection concerning the control of legality of the actions of the Commission, in the terms of paragraphs 18 and 19 of this judgment. 2. To reject the preliminary objection concerning the failure to exhaust domestic remedies, in the terms of paragraphs 25 and 26 of this judgment. DECLARES, unanimously, that: 3. The State is responsible for violating Articles 8(1) and 25(2)(c) of the American Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of the persons listed in Annex I of this judgment. unanimously, that: 4. The State is responsible for violating Articles 8(1), 25(1) and 25(2)(c) of the American Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of the persons listed in Annex II of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 95 to 98 of the judgment. By five votes in favor and two votes against, that: 5. The State is responsible for violating Articles 26 and 21 of the American Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of the persons listed in Annex I of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 107 to 115 of this judgment. Dissenting: Judges Eduardo Vio Grossi and Humberto A. Sierra Porto. AND ESTABLISHES: unanimously, that: 6. This judgment constitutes, per se, a form of reparation. 7. The State shall make the effective payment of the pending reimbursements according to what has been ordered by the decision of February 12, 1992, in the terms of paragraphs 125 and 143 to 148 of this judgment. 8. The State shall issue the publications ordered in paragraph 128 of this judgment. 9. The State shall pay the amounts fixed in paragraph 141 of this judgment as non-pecuniary damages, in the terms of paragraphs 143 to 148 of this judgment. 10. The State shall, within one year of notification of this judgment, present the Court with a report on the measures adopted to comply with this judgment. 37