9 provisions of operative paragraphs two, three and four of the May 31, 2001 Judgment (supra Having Seen 2). The Court also noted that the interest owed for arrearages in payment of the reparations is yet to be paid. 11. Based on the information forwarded to the Court by the State (supra Having Seen 19) and the representatives (supra Having Seen 20 and 22), an arbitral award was issued on September 14, 2004, which established that the State must pay Mr. Cesti Hurtado US$ 3,065,085 (three million sixty-five thousand eighty-five United States dollars), composed of the following items: US$ 3,000,000 (three million United States dollars) for “loss of value of the business,” and US$ 65,085 (sixty-five thousand eighty-five United States dollars) for lost earnings of Mr. Cesti Hurtado from July 1997 to December 1999 (supra Having Seen 22), with respect to the provisions of operative paragraph one of the May 31, 2001 Judgment (supra Having Seen 3). 12. After analyzing the documents supplied by the State, by the representatives of the victim and by the Commission, the Court notes that it does not have sufficient information on the following points pending as regards compliance: a) b) c) d) payment of the interest owed in connection with compensation for moral damages (Operative Paragraphs two, three, four and six of the May 31, 2001 Judgment; investigation of the facts of the instant case and punishment of those responsible (Operative Paragraph five of the May 31, 2001 Judgment); payment of material damages (Operative Paragraph one of the May 31, 2001 Judgment); and annulment of the military proceedings and all their effects (Operative Paragraph eight of the September 29, 1999 Judgment). 13. The Court will consider the general status of compliance with its Judgments on the merits and reparations once it receives said report by the State and the respective comments by the representatives of the victims and of the Commission. * * * NOW THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, exercising its authority to oversee compliance with its decisions, pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, FINDS: 1. That it will continue to oversee compliance with the points currently pending compliance, namely: