3 […] 6. That from monitoring compliance with the judgments on merits and reparations delivered in this case, and having examined the information provided by the State, the Inter-American Commission and the victim’s representatives, the Court ha[d] verified that the State ha[d] complied with: a) Payment of the amounts corresponding to compensation for pecuniary damages ordered in favor of Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides, Gladys Benavides López and Luis Fernando Cantoral Benavides (first operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); b) Payment of the amounts corresponding for non pecuniary damages ordered in favor of Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides, Gladys Benavides López, Luis Fernando Cantoral Benavides, Isaac Alonso Cantoral Benavides and José Antonio Cantoral Benavides (second operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); c) Payment of the amounts corresponding to the reimbursement of the costs and expenses ordered in favor of the representatives of the victim (third operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); d) Publication in the official gazette of the operative paragraphs of the judgment on merits of August 18, 2000 (seventh operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); e) Organization of an act of public apology acknowledging the State’s responsibility for the violations of the human rights of Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides (seventh operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); and f) Annulment of any judicial or administrative, criminal or police proceedings there may be against Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides, in relation to the facts of this case and cancellation of the corresponding records (fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001). 7. That, having examined the information provided by the State, the Commission and the victim’s representatives in their briefs on compliance with the judgment on reparations, the Court consider[ed] it essential that the State of Peru provide the Court with information on: a) payment of the interest accrued owing to the delays in the original payments (paragraph 97 of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); b) publication in a national newspaper of the operative paragraphs of the judgment on merits of August 18, 2000 (seventh operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); c) the medical treatment psychotherapy being provided to Gladys Benavides López (eighth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); d) the measures needed to annul the verdict convicting Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides delivered by the Supreme Court of Peru (fourth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); and e) the measures it ha[d] taken to award Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides a grant for university studies in an establishment of acknowledged academic quality, chosen by mutual agreement between the State and the victim, which cover[ed] the costs of the university career of the latter’s election, and also maintenance expenses during the period of these studies (sixth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001). 8. That in the judgment of August 18, 2000, the Court [had] decided [the following in operative paragraph twelve]: