8 24. That the Court values the actions carried out by the State to put at the disposal of the beneficiaries medical and psychological treatments, as well as training programs. On the other hand, it observes that a small percentage of victims have benefited from them. Therefore, the State shall continue with its task to divulge them in order to inform all the victims of the existence and availability of those programs. 25. That, without detriment of the aforementioned, the Tribunal observes that the compliance with this obligation by the State may depend, in great measure, on the cooperation and information provided by the representatives and beneficiaries. Therefore, it points out the importance of the progress made in the coordination between the State and the representatives in order to make compliance with these reparation measures a reality so they can reach all the beneficiaries. 26. That based on the previous considerations, the Court considers it necessary that the State forward with its next report an updated list of the beneficiaries who: a) have been given their identification card for medical attention; b) have had the diagnosis and/or have been offered medical and/or psychological treatment, and c) have been offered training courses or vocational assistance. * * * 27. That regarding the obligation to provide a place to deposit the body of Mario del Pilar Álvarez Pérez, son of Mrs. María Teresa de Jesús Pérez, in a cemetery close to her (fourteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment) the State informed that on May 4, 2007 contract 32/07 for the Usufruct of a Cemetery Plot was signed between the Municipality of Asunción and Mrs. María Teresa de Jesús Pérez. 28. That, likewise, Paraguay informed that through note PGRNo.100/08 of February 6, 2008 it requested that the City Council of Asuncion free a plot located in the Cemetery of the East in order to transfer it to the victim’s mother or, in its defect, grant a free usufruct for life over the same. Additionally, it requested the realization of the processes necessary in order to obtain the exemption of the payment of the municipal taxes that fall upon that plot. Additionally, it indicated that the processes before the municipal authorities for the exoneration of the corresponding taxes are still pending. It indicated that it started the process of building a mausoleum in the mentioned plot and that “it prepared a budget [and] it is currently awaiting some internal processes within the Ministry of Justice and Labor for the execution of that construction.” It clarified that titles over plots in cemeteries [within the Paraguayan system] is offered through the figure of usufruct for life [and] that cannot be changed.” 29. That the representatives regretted that several years after the Judgment was issued this simple obligation had not been complied with by the State. They considered that “the demand of a reasonable term also reaches the administrative processes that seek to determine a right and that the simplicity of the request in question does not justify the time invested in its resolution.” 30. That at the public hearing for monitoring compliance the representatives recalled that in the Memorandum of Understanding, the State had undertaken to carry out the processes necessary so the Municipal Board could donate the plot. This obligation has not been fulfilled by the fact that the body of Mario del Pilar Álvarez Pérez is in the cemetery, but it is necessary to grant “a juridical status to the plot that would allow the mother to have security that the body would not be removed.” Regarding the figure of usufruct, they reiterated that it would not be satisfactory and that the corresponding