8 34. The submission of December 16, 2005, wherein the Inter-American Commission made reference to the implementation of provisional measures and to the State’s failure to submit its sixth report, which Argentina should have submitted on October 26, 2005 (supra Having Seen Clause No. 28). 35. The submission of December 16, 2005, whereby the representatives reported on the alleged intimidation and threats sustained by Pablo Salinas, one of the representatives. 36. The note of December 19, 2005, wherein the Secretariat, following instructions of its President, requested that Argentina comment —in its next report— on the information filed by the representatives on December 12, 2005 (supra Having Seen Clause No. 33). 37. The submission of December 19, 2005, in which Argentina made reference to the information submitted by the representatives that “Sebastian Pablo Matías Esquivel was injured by stabbing […] and that inmate Antonio Gil Caballero [had died],” as requested from the Government by way of Secretariat’s note of December 9, 2005, (supra Having Seen Clause No. 32). In this regard, Argentina claimed that the death of inmate Antonio Gil-Caballero was due to “natural causes” and that there were no evidences whatsoever of the injuries reported in connection with inmate Sebastián Pablo Matías-Esquivel. 38. The submission of December 19, 2005, wherein the representatives filed a document concerning a decision of Amnesty International in connection with the alleged threats reported by the representatives, particularly in connection with Mr. Pablo Salinas. 39. The note of December 20, 2005, wherein the Secretariat requested once again the submission of the sixth State’s report, as it had not been filed by its due date. Consequently, following instructions of the President of the Court, Argentina was requested to enlarge on the implementation of provisional measures, as well as on the presumed intimidation suffered by Mr. Pablo Salinas, in the report Argentina had to submit on December 26, 2005. Furthermore, the Inter-American Commission was requested to include comments on said information among its observations to the sixth State’s report. 40. The Secretariat’s note of January 9, 2006, requesting the State to submit its sixth and seventh reports, as the terms had expired on October 26, 2005, and December 26, 2005, respectively, and these reports had not been received. Furthermore, as part of those reports, the State was required to include comments as requested by way of Secretariat’s note of December 20, 2005 (supra Having Seen Clause No. 39). 41. The submission of January 11, 2006, whereby the State filed its sixth and seventh State’s reports, describing inter alia the state of investigations, the condition of the criminal juvenile adult population, as well as the actions taken in order to set off the quantity imbalance between inmates and penitentiary staff members, and to train penitentiary personnel. Furthermore, the State stated once again its willingness to comply with the provisional measures ordered. Moreover, the State made reference to the information requested by way of Secretariat’s note of December 20, 2005, on the presumed intimidations sustained by Mr. Pablo Salinas, one of the representatives of the beneficiaries. In this regard, the State claimed that it had