4 customary land use practices, without prejudice to other tribal and indigenous communities; 3. Refrain from acts that might give rise to activities of third parties, acting with the State’s acquiescence or tolerance, that may affect the right to property or integrity of the territory of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples as established in this Report; 4. Review, through effective and fully informed consultations with the Kaliña and Lokono peoples and their members and respecting their customary law, the land titles, lease holds, and long-term leases issued to non-indigenous persons, the terms of the mining activities authorized inside the Wane Kreek Nature Reserve, and the terms of the establishment and management of the Wia Wia, Galibi, and Wane Kreek Nature Reserves, to determine the modifications that must be made to the terms of these titles, lease holds, long-term leases, concession and Nature Reserves to ensure respect for the property rights of the Kaliña and Lokono over their ancestral lands, territories and natural resources in accordance with their customs and traditions; 5. Take all necessary steps, through effective and fully informed consultations with the Kaliña and Lokono peoples and their members and respecting their customary law, to delimit, demarcate and grant collective title to the Kaliña and Lokono peoples over the lands and territories that they have traditionally occupied and used; 6. Take the necessary steps to approve, in accordance with Suriname’s constitutional procedures and the provisions of the American Convention, such legislative and other measures as may be needed to provide judicial protections and give effect to the collective and individual rights of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples in relation to the territory they have traditionally occupied and used. 7. Redress individually and collectively the consequences of the violation of the aforementioned rights. Especially, consider the damages caused to the members of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples as a result of the failure to grant them legal title of their ancestral territory as well as the damages caused on the territory by the acts of third parties. Moreover, the IACHR considers that the instant case raises questions of interAmerican public order. First, the instant case reveals a structural problem of the lack of recognition, in the domestic legislation, of the juridical personality and of the collective property rights of indigenous peoples in Suriname. Another component of this issue is the