6 the measure adopted by the State was not sufficient to comply with the applicable international standards. They added that the report of the State did not clearly indicate whether the services described therein were available to all inmates or only in one or some penitentiary centers, whereby they considered that the State had not complied with this part of operative paragraph 9; d) as to the physical and sanitary conditions, they pointed out that the report of the State failed to mention the centers in which improvements had been made. They considered that, under the United Nations Standards Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, the measures reported by the State were not satisfactory to guarantee the rights of inmates; and e) as to the training of the penitentiary staff in human rights, they pointed out that the State did neither inform the contents of the training courses nor if the programs were permanent. 19. That regarding the improvement of penitentiary conditions, the Commission expressed its concern about the failure of the State to submit information. It further pointed out that, in accordance with the observations made by the representatives, in Honduras there are 24 penitentiary centers and that the information submitted by the State was not clear as to whether the measures had been adopted in all such centers. Furthermore, it endorsed the representatives’ claim alleging that though the measures reported by the State were specific, they did not conform to a public policy oriented towards improving the penitentiary system. It concluded that the State should inform in detail about the measures adopted and the extent to which they are in keeping with the measures ordered in the Judgment (supra Having Seen 4). 20. Based on the information submitted by the parties, the Court observes that though the State has informed about the specific measures it has implemented regarding compliance with operative paragraph 9, it deems it imperative that the State inform in which penitentiary centers such measures were adopted in order to ensure an adequate diet and medical care for the inmates, as well as physical and sanitary conditions consistent with the applicable international standards. Furthermore, it considers that the State must inform in detail about the contents of education programs in human rights offered to the personnel of penitentiary centers. * * * 21. That with regard to operative paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14, the State pointed out that it has complied with payment of the compensations ordered by the Court, covering the full compensation amounts to all beneficiaries. At first, it paid said amounts to Alfredo López-Álvarez, Teresa Reyes-Reyes, Alba Luz García-Álvarez, Rina Maribel García-Álvarez, Mirna Suyapa García-Álvarez and Apolonia Álvarez-Aranda, attaching the delivery documents and payment receipt for said amounts. It further stated that regarding Catarino López, Joel Enrique García-Álvarez, and Marcia Migdalia García-Álvarez, owing to errors in their written names, after due checking and confirmation of their names before a notary public, the State paid the compensatory amounts. With regard to the other victims Alfred Omaly López-Suazo, José Álvarez-