DECLARES: Unanimously, that 1. It does not correspond to rule on the alleged violation of due process established in Article 8(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, under the terms of paragraphs 63 and 64 and 68 to 84 of this Judgment. 2. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to judicial protection established in Articles 25(1) and 25(2)(c) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of José Alfredo Mejía Idrovo, in the terms of paragraphs 89 to 112 of this Judgment. 3. It was not demonstrated that the State failed to comply with the obligation enshrined in Article 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of José Alfredo Mejía Idrovo, in the terms established in paragraph 115 of this Judgment. 4. It does not correspond to rule on the alleged violation of the right to equal protection before the Law established in Article 24 of the American Convention on Human Rights, pursuant to paragraphs 120 to 125 of the present Judgment. 5. The State complied with its obligation to reinstate Mr. José Alfredo Mejía Idrovo, and to thereby restore his rights, under the terms of paragraphs 137 and 138 of this Judgment. AND ORDERS, Unanimously, that 1. This Judgment is, per se, a form of reparation. 2. The State must carry out the publications ordered in paragraphs 141 of this Judgment, in the manner and period indicated in the mentioned paragraph of this Judgment. 3. The State must pay the amounts established in paragraphs 156 and 163, within the respective periods, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, and costs and expenses, in the terms and conditions indicated in paragraphs 150 to 155 and 161, 162 and 164 of the present Judgment. 4. Within a period of one year as of notification of this Judgment and in monitoring compliance with the Judgment, the State shall submit to the Court a report on the measures adopted in order to comply with the Judgment. 5. The Court shall close this case once the State has fully complied with the provisions established in this Judgment. 49