8 human physiological needs at all stages throughout the life cycle and according to gender and occupation.”12 That, according to the information provided, and not contested by the State, the food delivered each month to the victims is only sufficient for 21 days; that a high percentage of the children of the Community have growth atrophy and that there are two cases of acute malnutrition. That, without ignoring the measures that the State has taken to date, the Court considers that the provision of food has been insufficient to resolve the situation described and the situation of abandon that the Court examined in its Judgment. 33. That the Court finds a discrepancy between the State and the representatives regarding the management of biological waste. On the one hand, the State indicates that it has built several latrines. On the other hand, the representatives affirm that the construction materials have been purchased and sent to the Community, but that the construction has not started. The Court requires more information on this point. 34. That the Court notes the delivery of educational materials to the schools of the settlements of the Community, as well as the talks that the State has given. However, it finds it appropriate to request the State to comment on the difficulties reported by the representatives (supra twenty-fifth Considering paragraph in fine). 35. That the Court shares the Commission’s opinion that the insufficiencies in the delivery of basic goods and services, added to the failure to grant the traditional lands, affects the very existence of the Community and its cultural survival as a group. * * * 36. That, regarding the installation of a communications system that allows the victims to contact the competent health authorities in case of emergency (tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment), the State advised that “the Sawhoyamaxa settlements have a UHF radio installed by INDI.” 37. That the representatives “confirm[ed] the installation of the radio systems in the Community’s two settlements.” 38. That the Commission noted compliance with this aspect. 39. That, based on the information provided by the parties, the Court finds that the State has complied fully with this aspect of the Judgment. * * * 40. That, regarding the registration and documentation program (eleventh operative paragraph of the Judgment), the State advised that “officials from the INDI Community Registration Bureau had visited the Community three times […] accompanied by an official from the Identification Department of the National Police Force to issue identity cars, and also birth certificates and the Indigenous Peoples Identity Card.” 12 Cf. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General comment No. 12, “The right to adequate food (art. 11)”. United Nations, Document E/C.12/1999/5 (1999), para. 9.