135 because this damage will be repaired by other non-pecuniary forms of reparation (infra paras. 404 and 407). 376. Regarding the conciliation agreements presented as evidence to the Court, which had been settled during the administrative proceedings (supra para. 125(101)), the Court recalls the principle that reparations should not make the victims or their successors either richer or poorer. As indicated above (supra paras. 335 to 343), these agreements establish compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage that includes some of the elements covered by the reparations for these concepts granted by the Court. The Court will therefore take into account the cases of those who have benefited from these agreements in the administrative proceedings, in relation to both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, when applicable. Since the Court has no evidence that the amounts granted at the domestic level in the administrative jurisdiction in relation to the facts of the massacre of El Aro have been paid, it will proceed to order reparations for pecuniary and non-pecuniary to the victims in this case who lived in that district, without prejudice to the State subtracting the amounts granted at the domestic level when paying the reparations ordered by the Court. Should the reparations granted in the administrative proceedings be greater than those ordered by the Court in this judgment, the State may not subtract this difference from the victim. 377. Regarding the proceedings for direct reparation filed by the victims in this case or their next of kin that are still pending before the Colombian administrative jurisdiction, the Court establishes pertinent reparations in this judgment irrespective of their current status. When the State makes the respective payments, it should inform the courts that are hearing these proceedings so they can take this into consideration in their decisions.270 378. Regarding the displaced persons, when determining the corresponding reparations, the Court will take into account that some of them have received assistance from the State based on their situation. 379. Consequently, on grounds of equity, and taking into account the evidence provided and the arguments presented by the parties, the Court establishes the compensation for pecuniary damage to the victims who have been identified and who are listed in Appendix I of this judgment for the persons deprived of their life and in Appendix III for those who lost livestock. C) Non-pecuniary damage The Commission’s arguments 380. Regarding non-pecuniary damage, the Commission indicated that: (a) The Court should order the payment of compensation, on grounds of equity, and considering the characteristics of the context of the extrajudicial execution of the victims; 270 Cf. Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre, supra note 9, para. 251.