h.2) Actions under the ordinary jurisdiction 107. In addition to the appeals filed under the administrative and contentiousadministrative system before the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal, at least 136 alleged victims filed actions under the ordinary jurisdiction against the Banco de Montevideo based on, inter alia, contractual non-compliances as well as requests for reparation of damages.182 Of these 136 alleged victims, the Court has the judgments answer, volume VI, attachment 27, folio 15607); Judgment No. 292 of the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal of June 6, 2007, in proceedings entitled “Rodríguez, Marta v. the Central Bank of Uruguay. Appeal for annulment” (file of attachments to the answer, volume VI, attachment 27, folios 15627 and 15628); Judgment No. 272 of the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal of June 4, 2007, in proceedings entitled “Notero, Ángel et al. v. the Central Bank of Uruguay. Appeal for annulment” (file of attachments to the answer, volume VII, attachment 27, folio 16402); Judgment No. 691 of the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal of September 16, 2010, in proceedings entitled “Clemata José et al. v. the Central Bank of Uruguay. Appeal for annulment” (file of attachments to the answer, volume III, attachment 27, folio 13882); Judgment No. 316 of the ContentiousAdministrative Tribunal of June 18, 2007, in proceedings entitled “Contín, Gianni et al. v. the Central Bank of Uruguay. Appeal for annulment” (file of attachments to the answer, volume IV, attachment 27, folio 14477); Judgment No. 719 of the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal of October 25, 2006, in proceedings entitled “Horvath, Raúl v. the Central Bank of Uruguay. Appeal for annulment” (file of attachments to the answer, volume V, attachment 27, folio 15127), and Judgment No. 726 of the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal of December 17, 2007, in proceedings entitled “Gutiérrez, Eduardo v. the Central Bank of Uruguay. Appeal for annulment” (file of attachments to the answer, volume V, attachment 27, folio 15152). 182 These cases are in the file of attachments to the answer, volumes III to VII, attachment 27, and correspond to the following alleged victims: (1) Alejandro Fontana, Magali Báez Carballido, Néstor Báez Porcile, in proceedings entitled “Colegio and Liceo Pallotti (Father Alejandro Fontana) et al. v. Banco de Montevideo S.A. in liquidation et al. – Other Proceedings - Recovery of pesos and damages.” File No. 232639/2005.” Judgment No. 34 of the First Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of September 24, 2007 (folios 13887 to 13906); (2) Liliana Barcarcel, in proceedings entitled “Oteiza Juan José et al. v. Banco de Montevideo S.A. et al. – Recovery of pesos – and damages.” File No. 21/417/2003.” Judgment No. 45 of the First Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of December 11, 2007, and Judgment No. 12 of the 7th Civil Court of Appeal of February 13, 2009 (folios 13808 to 13863); (3) Juan José Bocchi Paladino, in proceedings entitled “Bocchi Paladino, Juan et al. v. Banco de Montevideo et al. – Damages.” File No. 40/190/2003. Judgment No. 7 of the First Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of April 7, 2008, and Judgment No. 58 of the 3rd Civil Court of Appeal of March 20, 2009 (folios 13687 to 13709); (4) Enrique Colombo Pampin, Zulma Pérez Bogao, in proceedings entitled “Blanc Sellares, José Osvaldo et al. v. Banco de Montevideo et al. – Other Proceedings.” File No. 2-14605/2006. Judgment No. 9 of the 2nd Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of July 21, 2008, and Judgment No. 108 of the 5th Civil Court of Appeal of September 21, 2009 (folios 14167 to 14199); (5) Beatriz Di Carlo, Daniel Bellesi and Carlos Mazzuchi, in proceedings entitled “Di Carlo Beatriz et al. v. Banco de Montevideo FRPB et al. – Corporate lawsuits for liability.” File No. 2-16145/2006. Judgment No. 13 of the First Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of July 21, 2008, and Judgment No. 108 of the 2nd Civil Court of Appeal of April 29, 2009 (folios 13747 to 14767); (6) María Abal Gemelli, Mario Abal Bordachar, in proceedings entitled “Abal Bordachar, Mario et al. v. Banco de Montevideo S.A. (in liquidation) et al. – Compliance with contract. Damages.” File No. 225766/2006. Judgment No. 28 of the Civil Court of First Instance of October 6, 2008, and Judgment No. 100 of the Civil Court of Appeal of September 2, 2009 (folios 14106 to 14129); (7) Elina Braceras and Rafael Braceras in proceedings entitled “Braceras Lussich, Elina et al. v. Banco de Montevideo in liquidation et al. – Other Proceedings.” File No. 2-25767/2006. Judgment No. 22 of the First Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of December 2, 2008, and Judgment No. 169 of the 2nd Civil Court of Appeal of May 26,, 2010, (folios 13563 to 13604); (8) María del Huerto Breccia and Carlos La Cava, in proceedings entitled “Breccia, María del Huerto et al. v. Banco de Montevideo S.A. (in liquidation) et al. – Other Proceedings - Compliance with contract plus damages.” File No. 2-25768/2006. Judgment No. 42 of the 2nd Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of December 23, 2008, Judgment No. 3 of the 2nd Civil Court of Appeal of February 10, 2010, and Judgment No. 1299 of the Supreme Court of Justice of May 2, 2011 (folios 14130 to 14166 and merits file, volume V, folios 1722 to 1726); (9) Juan José Baraza, Verónica Baril Korgan, Adolfo Batista, Esteban Bentancour, Bernardo Erramun, Julio Vinnotti, Raúl Horvath and Gerardo Ariano, in proceedings entitled “Buenaventura Sotelo, Rubén et al. v. Banco de Montevideo S.A. in liquidation et al. – Damages.” File No. 2-22807/2006. Judgment No. 17 of the 2nd Court of First Instance for insolvency proceedings of November 4, 2009, and Judgment No. 304 of the 3rd Civil Court of Appeal of October 21, 2010 (folios 13919 to 13964); (10) Gustavo Bertolini, Lita Bigoni Baccani, Hugo Da Silva Gaibisso, Bernardo Erramun, Nelson González, Horacio Parodi, Carlos Pascual Knaibl, Claudia Rovira Aparicio and Lilián Elena Schettini, in proceedings entitled “Sarubbi Rampoldi, Juan Nelson et al. v. Banco de Montevideo S.A. et al. – Preparatory measures, recovery of pesos.” File No. 3-229/2003. Judgment No. 2 of the Civil Court of First Instance of February 5, 2010, (folios 13711 to 13746); (11) Gustavo Barreiro and José Barreiro in proceedings entitled “Barreiro Díaz Jorge Walter et al. v. Banco de Montevideo S.A. in liquidation et al. – Recovery of pesos and Damages.” File No. 2-26754/2006. Judgment No. 10 of the Civil Court of First Instance of July 30, 2010 (folios 44